VEGA v. GRAY et al, No. 1:2011cv02122 - Document 23 (D.D.C. 2013)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 18 plaintiff's Motion to Stay discovery proceedings. Discovery in this case shall be stayed until further court order. The parties shall jointly file a status report on or before March 14, 2014. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on December 24, 2013. (MA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) VINCENT C. GRAY, ) Mayor of the District of Columbia et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) LUCIA VEGA, Civil Action No. 11-2122 (PLF) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On September 25, 2013, the plaintiff, Lucia Vega, filed a motion to stay discovery [Dkt. No. 18] because of her health and her need for continuing medical attention. The District of Columbia opposed this motion. See Dkt. No. 19. At a status conference held on October 4, 2013, the District enumerated its concerns regarding the plaintiff s apparent lack of attentiveness to the conduct of discovery in this case, as demonstrated by allegedly inadequate responses to the District s document requests, as well as the plaintiff s failure to submit any of its own discovery requests to the District. Plaintiff s counsel, while acknowledging a need to more vigorously engage in discovery, focused the Court s attention on the plaintiff s current medical condition, which, counsel argued, rendered her unable to participate actively in the prosecution of her case, at least for the time being. At the time of the status conference, however, plaintiff s counsel had been unable to obtain sufficient information from the plaintiff, who now resides in Hawaii, regarding her medical status and the prospects for future participation in this case. On November 21, 2013, the parties filed a joint status report in which they reiterated their positions regarding discovery. See Dkt. No. 21. In this report, plaintiff s counsel maintained his belief that it would be devastating for the Plaintiff to engage in continuation of discovery at this time, and that Ms. Vega feels strongly that she must use all her energy to fight the cancer. Id. at 2-3. Plaintiff s counsel also reported that he had finally received information from Ms. Vega s doctors regarding her medical status. These documents have now been provided to the Court. Among them is a letter from Ms. Vega s treating physician, in which he states that [d]ue to [Ms.Vega s] ongoing medical treatment, she is unable to travel and participate in legal matters, such as depositions. At earliest, she will be able to travel and participate in legal proceedings in March 2014 . . . pending medical evaluation following her medical treatment and recovery. In view of these representations, the Court is unwilling to subject Ms. Vega to further exertion while she is undergoing intensive cancer treatment. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff s motion to stay discovery proceedings [Dkt. No. 18] is GRANTED; it is FURTHER ORDERED that discovery in this case shall be stayed until further order of the Court; and it is 2 FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall jointly file a status report on or before March 14, 2014, informing the Court of the prospects for the resumption of discovery in this case. In particular, plaintiff s counsel should provide the Court with an update from Ms. Vega s physicians as to the state of her health and her ability to sit for a deposition. SO ORDERED. /s/___________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN United States District Judge DATE: December 24, 2013 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.