FREEMAN vs. CHARVIS ET AL, No. 1:2011cv01046 - Document 16 (D.D.C. 2011)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION to 15 ORDER. Signed by Judge James E. Boasberg on 9/23/2011. (lcjeb1)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARK ELLIOTT FREEMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 11-1046 (JEB) HUGO CHARVIS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION On or around June 6, 2011, Plaintiff Mark Freeman filed an incomprehensible Complaint naming scores of Defendants and mentioning everything from his New Jersey high school records to his decision to decline matching funds when running for President of the United States to a settlement conference in the Virgin Islands. Defendant Todd Newman filed a Motion to Dismiss on August 15, 2011, and the Court that same day directed Plaintiff to respond by September 14, 2011, or face the risk that the case would be dismissed. Plaintiff has yet to respond to Newman s Motion. Although Defendant raises many compelling arguments as to the deficiency of Plaintiff s Complaint, the Court need not address them. Instead, the Court will, as with Defendant Bryant s Motion to Dismiss, by separate Order this day, find that Plaintiff has conceded the Motion under LCvR 7(b), thereby resulting in dismissal. /s/ James E. Boasberg JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge Date: September 23, 2011
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
