COLBERT v. OHIO COURT OF APPEALS, No. 1:2010cv01312 - Document 3 (D.D.C. 2010)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Thomas F. Hogan on 7/29/2010. (ls, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Antonio Colbert, Plaintiff, v. Ohio Supreme Court of Appeals, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FILED AUG - 5 ""'!1. .. {. Clerk. U.S. DistricI & Bankruj.ltcy COUr1B for the District of Columbia Civil Action No. 10 1312 MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff is a District of Columbia resident suing the appellate courts of the state of Ohio for unknown reasons. He does not accuse the defendant of any wrongdoing or attribute any conduct to it. In any event, this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to review the decisions (or lack thereof) of another court, see 28 U.S.c. ยงยง 1331, 1332 (general jurisdictional provisions); Flemingv. United States, 847 F. Supp. 170, 172 (D.D.C. 1994), cert. denied 513 U.S. 1150 (1995). A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. /' Oate{)tt/1Q ,2010

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.