WHITING v. AARP et al, No. 1:2009cv00455 - Document 40 (D.D.C. 2010)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT, For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 28th day of March, 2010, hereby ORDERED that defendant United HealthCare's Motion to Dismiss 15 is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the defendant AARP's Motion to Dismiss 17 is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the above-captioned case be DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 3/28/10. (see final judgment.) (kc)

Download PDF

WHITING v. AARP et al Doc. 40 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SUSAN WHITING, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ) AARP and UNITED HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. Civil Case No. 09-455 (RJL) ) ) ) ) ) FINAL JUDGMENT the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this _ _ day of March, 2010, hereby ORDERED that the defendant United HealthCare's Motion to Dismiss [#15] is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the defendant AARP's Motion to Dismiss [#17] is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the above-captioned case be DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED. United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.