REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, No. 1:2008cv01953 - Document 103 (D.D.C. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT, For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion, it is this 26th day of March, 2010, hereby ORDERED that Defendant Federal Election Commission's Motion for Summary Judgment 56 is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED tha t Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment 21 is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that Defendant Federal Election Commission's Motion To Dismiss 20 is DENIED AS MOOT; and it is further ORDERED that final judgment be entered for the defendant. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, Judge Richard J. Leon, and Judge Rosemary M. Collyer on 3/26/10. (kc )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE et al v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Doc. 103 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Republican National Committee, California Republican Party, Republican Party of San Diego County, and Michael Steele, Plaintiffs, v. Federal Election Commission, Defendant, Democratic National Committee and Representative Christopher Van Hollen, Jr., Intervenors. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil No. 08-1953 (BMK)(RJL)(RMC) Three-Judge Court -------------------------) ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion, it is this 26 th day of March, 2010, hereby ORDERED that Defendant Federal Election Commission's Motion for Summary Judgment [#56] is GRANTED; it is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [#21] is DENIED; it is further ORDERED that Defendant Federal Election Commission's Motion To Dismiss [#20] is DISMISSED AS MOOT; and it is further 1 Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED that final judgment be entered for the defendant. SO ORDERED. BRETT M. KA V ANA GH United States Circuit Judge United States District Judge '1 .I . ' j II itl )/ ! .ROSEMARy M. COLLfER United States District Judge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
