MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al v. IRAN, THE ISLAMIC RE, et al, No. 1:1982cv00220 - Document 982 (D.D.C. 2013)

Court Description: ORDER, For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 27th day of March, 2013, hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Final Judgment 961 , 969 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is fu rther ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of plaintiffs and against the defendants in the amount of $40,551,000.40; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiffs are entitled to seek additional fees and costs incurred after June 30, 2012 and u ntil the conclusion of this litigation and are hereby authorized to submit a further application for such fees and costs consistent with this Judgment; and it is further ORDERED that in accordance with U.S.C. 1961, post-judgment interest shall accru e on all amounts awarded to plaintiffs pursuant to this Judgment as of the date hereoff; and it is further ORDERED that defendants' July 30, 2012 motion 960 is DENIED as MOOT. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Richard J. Leon on 3/27/2013. (see order) (kc )

Download PDF
MCKESSON CORPORATION, et al v. IRAN, THE ISLAMIC RE, et al Doc. 982 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MCKESSON CORP. et al., Plaintiffs, v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civ. Action No. 82-220 (RJL) (Marchz2. 2013) [Dkts. ##960, 961, 969] For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this ofMarch, 2013, hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Final Judgment [Dkts. ##961, 969] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and it is further ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants in the amount of$40,551,000.40; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiffs are entitled to seek additional fees and costs incurred after June 30, 2012 and until the conclusion of this litigation and are hereby authorized to submit a further application for such fees and costs consistent with this Judgment; and it is further Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED that in accordance with U.S.C. ยง 1961, post-judgment interest shall accrue on all amounts awarded to plaintiffs pursuant to this Judgment as of the date hereof; and it is further ORDERED that defendants' July 30, 2012 motion [Dkt. #960] is DENIED as MOOT. SO ORDERED. CHARDJ.L United States District Judge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.