Startrak Information Technologies, LLC v. Mark-It Services, Inc. et al, No. 1:2014cv01155 - Document 38 (D. Del. 2014)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 09/07/2014. (walk, ) [Transferred from Virginia Eastern on 9/10/2014.]
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 IN THE UNITED FOR THE STATES DISTRICT L E rt COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA SEP - 9 2014 Richmond Division B CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND, VA STARTRAK INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. MARK-IT SERVICES, et al., 3:14cv384 INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on TRANSFER VENUE TO THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE, ยง 1404(a) (Docket No. 17). DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted. BACKGROUND On May 30, 2014, StarTrak Information Technologies, LLC ("StarTrak") filed this patent infringement action against Mark-It Services, Inc. ("Mark-It") and WAM Technologies, LLC ("WAM"). On July 21, 2014, Mark-It and WAM filed the DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 15) and the pending Motion to Transfer Venue. Rather than respond to the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, StarTrak filed an Amended Complaint on July 31, 2014 to which Mark-It and WAM filed Answers on August 18 (Docket No. 33). At the Initial
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
