Hanks v. City of Richmond, VA et al, No. 1:2014cv03243 - Document 20 (D. Colo. 2015)

Court Description: Final JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of City of Richmond, VA, The, Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Richmond, The, Brooke Pettit, John W. Hickenlooper, Mitchell R. Morrisey, Patricia Tucker, Terry McAuliffe against James WIlliam Hanks, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/28/2015. (slibi, )

Download PDF
Hanks v. City of Richmond, VA et al Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Case No. 14-cv-03243-MJW JAMES WILLIAM HANKS, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF RICHMOND, VA, BROOKE PETTIT, in her individual capacity, THE COMMONWEALTH’S ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND, VA, PATRICIA TUCKER, extradition specialist for the Commonwealth of Virginia, TERRY MCAULIFFE, Governor of Virginia, JOHN W. HICKENLOOPER, Governor of Colorado, and MITCH R. MORRISEY, the Denver District Attorney, as agent of the State of Virginia, Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Order entered by the Honorable Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on January 28, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause is MADE ABSOLUTE. FURTHER ORDERED that final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, The City of Richmond, VA, Brooke Pettit, The Commonwealth’s Attorney for the City and County of Richmond, VA, Patricia Tucker, Terry McAuliffe, John W. Hickenlooper, and Mitch R. Morrisey, and against Plaintiff, James William Hanks. It is FURTHER ORDERED this case is DISMISSED pursuant to the Younger abstention doctrine and Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). Defendants are AWARDED their costs under Fe. R. Civ. P. 54(d). Dockets.Justia.com FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and this civil action are DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 28th day of January, 2015. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK s/ S. Libid S. Libid, Deputy Clerk 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.