Knight et al v. Bieneman et al, No. 1:2014cv02641 - Document 37 (D. Colo. 2015)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT. re: 36 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, by Clerk (dhans, )

Download PDF
Knight et al v. Bieneman et al Doc. 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 14-cv-2641-WJM-CBS EUGENE KNIGHT, L.K., by and through her next friend Eugene Knight, and A.K., by and through his next friend Eugene Knight, Plaintiffs, v. PAULA BIENEMAN, in her official capacity as Principal of Palmer Elementary School, LEE COOPER, in his official capacity as Deputy Instructional Superintendent of Denver Public Schools, and TOM BOASBERG, in his official capacity as the Superintendent of the Denver Public Schools, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), all Orders entered during the pendency of this case and the Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction entered by the Honorable William J. Martínez, United States District Judge, on January 14, 2015, IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 9) is DENIED and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff’s claims brought under the United States Constitution are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. The Court DECLINES JURISDICTION over Plaintiff’s claims brought under the Colorado Constitution, and such claims are Dockets.Justia.com DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Final Judgment is entered for Defendants and against the Plaintiffs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are awarded costs upon the filing of a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of Court within fourteen days after entry of Final Judgment. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 14th day of January 2015. BY THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Deborah Hansen Deborah Hansen, Deputy Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.