USA v. 16650 Jasmine Street, Brighton, Colorado et al, No. 1:2014cv02630 - Document 34 (D. Colo. 2015)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of USA against 121 Assorted Marijuana Grow Equipment, 2004 Toyota Sienna Van re: 33 Order on Motion for Default Judgment, Order on Report and Recommendations, by Clerk on 4/24/2015. (evana, )

Download PDF
USA v. 16650 Jasmine Street, Brighton, Colorado et al Doc. 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-02630-WJM-NYW UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 2004 TOYOTA SIENNA VAN; 121 ASSORTED MARIJUANA GROW EQUIPMENT; 242 ASSORTED MARIJUANA GROW EQUIPMENT; 283 ASSORTED MARIJUANA GROW EQUIPMENT, Defendants ______________________________________________________________________ FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS 2004 TOYOTA SIENNA VAN AND 121 ASSORTED MARIJUANA GROW EQUIPMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Final Order of Forfeiture entered by the Honorable District Court Judge William J. Martinez, the following JUDGMENT is hereby entered: 1. That forfeiture of defendants 2004 Toyota Sienna Van, VIN: 5TDZA22CX4S201270 and 121 Assorted Marijuana Grow Equipment including all right, title, and interest is hereby entered in favor of the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881. 2. That the United States shall have full and legal title as to the above described defendant assets and may dispose of said assets in accordance with law ; 3. That Final Order of Forfeiture shall serve as a Certificate of Reasonable Cause under 28 U.S.C. § 2465. 1 Dockets.Justia.com 4. Per the parties’ settlement agreement, the parties have waived their entitlement to costs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. Done at Denver, Colorado this _____ day of __________________, 2015. April 24th JEFFREY P. COLWELL Clerk of the U.S. District Court By: _____________________________ s/E. Van Alphen Deputy Clerk 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.