Laurienti et al v. Bicha et al, No. 1:2014cv02592 - Document 73 (D. Colo. 2016)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk in favor of Kathy Nesbitt, Paulette St. James, Reggie Bicha, Sandra Anderson and against William J. Laurienti re: 72 Memorandum Opinion and Order by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/09/16. (nmarb, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Laurienti et al v. Bicha et al Doc. 73 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-02592-NYW WILLIAM J. LAURIENTI, Plaintiff, v. REGGIE BICHA, KATHY NESBITT, PAULETTE ST. JAMES, and SANDRA ANDERSON, each in their individual capacities, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Orders entered during the course of proceedings in this case, the following FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered. I. PURSUANT to and in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered by the Honorable Nina Y. Wang, on February 9, 2016 , incorporated herein by reference, it is ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint [#56] is GRANTED. The Motion for Dismissal of the Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to F. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and F.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) [#57] is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants Reggie Bicha, Kathy Nesbitt, Paulette St. James, and Sandra Anderson, and against Plaintiff, William J. Laurienti. It is Dockets.Justia.com FURTHER ORDERED that the Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED, with each party to pay her and his own costs. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 9th day of February, 2016. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK s/N. Marble N. Marble, Deputy Clerk 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
