Wittmer v. E.I Dupont, No. 1:2014cv00091 - Document 40 (D. Colo. 2014)
Court Description: Final Judgment. ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendant DuPont and against plaintiff Nicole Wittmer. It is further ORDERED that defendant is AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. It is further ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety. Entered by Clerk on 12/29/14. (jhawk, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Wittmer v. E.I Dupont Doc. 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-00091-PAB-BNB NICOLE WITTMER, Plaintiff, v. DuPONT, Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Order [Docket No. 39] of United States District Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on December 23, 2014, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 36] is ACCEPTED. It is further ORDERED that defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Wittmer’s First Amended Complaint [Docket No. 16] is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of defendant DuPont and against plaintiff Nicole Wittmer. It is further ORDERED that defendant is AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. It is further ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety. Dockets.Justia.com Dated at Denver, Colorado this 29th day of December, 2014. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Jennifer Hawkins Deputy Clerk
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
