Ryberg v. The City and County of Denver et al, No. 1:2013cv02333 - Document 27 (D. Colo. 2014)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT re: 26 Order. Signed by Clerk on 08/14/2014. (athom, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Ryberg v. The City and County of Denver et al Doc. 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-02333-CMA-KLM ROBERT L. RYBERG, on behalf of Decendant Kevin C. Ryberg, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kevin C. Ryberg, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, THE DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT, DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER TIMOTHY LUKE, DENVER POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICER RANDALL KROUSE, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Order Adopting in Part and Rejecting in Part April 29, 2014 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge of Judge Christine M. Arguello entered on August 13, 2014 it is ORDERED that the April 29, 2014 Amended Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix (Docket No. 22) REJECTED in part as to the Eighth Amendment claim and ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED in all other respects. It is further ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1) (Doc. # 15) is GRANTED. Specifically, it is ORDERED that: Dockets.Justia.com 1. Defendants Luke and Krouse are entitled to qualified immunity on Plaintiff’sFourth Amendment Claims and those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUTPREJUDICE. 2. Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 3. Defendants Luke and Krouse are entitled to qualified immunity on Plaintiff’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment and those claims are DISMISSEDWITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Luke and Krouse in their official capacity are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 5. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant City and County of Denver are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 6. Plaintiff’s claims against Denver Police Department are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 7. Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 8. Plaintiff’s claims against John and Jane Does 1-10 are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 9. This case is dismissed in its entirety. It is further ORDERED the Defendants shall have their costs by the filing of a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of this Court within fourteen (14) days of entry of judgment, and pursuant to the procedures set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 14th day of August, 2014. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ A. Thomas Deputy Clerk
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
