Watson v. Cozza-Rhodes et al, No. 1:2013cv01456 - Document 44 (D. Colo. 2014)
Court Description: Final JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 43 Order, by Clerk on 4/11/2014. (klyon, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Watson v. Cozza-Rhodes et al Doc. 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-01456-PAB-MJW PIERRE TERRON O’NEAL WATSON, Plaintiff, v. T.K. COZZA-RHODES, Warden, DAN CLARK, Lieutenant, ED VINCENT, Counselor, JEFF GEORGE, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, and MIRANDA AVALOS, Lieutenant, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation [Docket No. 43] of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on April 10, 2014, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe [Docket No. 39] is ACCEPTED. It is further ORDERED that Defendants George, Cozza-Rhodes and Avalos’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies [Docket No. 33] is GRANTED and the claims against defendants JEFF GEORGE, T.K. COZZARHODES, and MIRANDA AVALOS are dismissed without prejudice. It is further Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED that the claims against unserved defendants DAN CLARK and ED VINCENT are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) on the basis of failure to exhaust administrative remedies. It is further ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff. It is further ORDERED that defendants T.K. COZZA-RHODES, DAN CLARK, ED VINCENT, JEFF GEORGE, and MIRANDA AVALOS are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. It is further ORDERED that this case is CLOSED. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 11th day of April, 2014. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Kathy Preuitt-Parks Kathy Preuitt-Parks Deputy Clerk
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
