Wiglesworth v. Pagel et al, No. 1:2013cv00957 - Document 68 (D. Colo. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT re: 64 Minute Order, by Clerk on 12/17/14. (sgrim)

Download PDF
Wiglesworth v. Pagel et al Doc. 68 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 13–cv–00957–KMT BILLY JACK WIGLESWORTH, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER PAGEL, and THE GEO GROUP, INC., Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Order (Doc. No. 61) of Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya entered on December 5, 2014 it is ORDERED Defendants Christopher Pagel and The Geo Group, Inc.’s “Motion to Dimiss” (Doc. No. 49) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED Plaintiff’s “Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint” (Doc. No. 55) is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that within thirty days from the date of this Order Plaintiff may file an amended complaint to assert only a claim or claims for negligence per se premised on the alleged violation of a Colorado statute. It is further Dockets.Justia.com ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint that complies with this Order, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and this Court’s Local Rules of Practice, within the time allowed, the court will dismiss this action and enter judgment in favor of the defendants. Pursuant to the Minute Order (Doc. No. 64) of Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya entered on December 16, 2014 it is ORDERED that based on Plaintiff's (Doc. No. 63) Notice Waiving Colorado Negligence Claims, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff in accordance with this Court's (Doc. No. 61) Order on Motion to Dismiss. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 17th day of December, 2014. BY THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ 2 S. Grimm Deputy Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.