Gowadia v. BOP et al, No. 1:2013cv00077 - Document 58 (D. Colo. 2014)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of defendants and against Plaintiff pursuant to the 57 Order, by Clerk on 3/12/2014. (eseam)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Gowadia v. BOP et al Doc. 58 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 13-cv-00077-KMT NOSHIR GOWADIA, Plaintiff, v. CULLY STEARNS (FDC-H), BRADLEY GREILICK (FDC-H), R.J. BALLASH (Western Reg. Off.), JOSE A. SANTANA (Des. And Sent Comp.), BLAKE R. DAVIS (former Warden ADX), DAVID BERKEBILE (Warden, ADX), and PAUL M. LAIRD (North Cent Reg Off.), Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Order [Doc. No. 57, filed March 12, 2014] of Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya, it is ORDERED that Defendants Stearns, Greilick, Santana, Berkebile, and Laird’s “Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. No. 43) and Defendant Ballash’s “Joinder to the Motion to Dismiss” (Doc. No. 55) are GRANTED as follows: 1. The claims against Defendant Greilick, Laird, Santana, Stearns, and Ballash are dismissed without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction; 2. Plaintiff’s Bivens claims for monetary damages against the individual Dockets.Justia.com defendants in their official capacities are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; 3. The claims against Defendants Davis and Berkebile are dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; 4. Defendants Davis and Berkebile are entitled to qualified immunity as to Plaintiff’s claims against them; 5. This case is dismissed in its entirety; and 6. Judgment shall enter on behalf of the defendants and against Plaintiff. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 12th day of March, 2014. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK s/Nicholas Richards Nicholas Richards Deputy Clerk
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
