C.S. et al v. Platte Canyon School District No. 1 et al, No. 1:2012cv03358 - Document 78 (D. Colo. 2014)

Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT re: 77 Order. Signed by Clerk on 09/24/2014. (athom, )

Download PDF
C.S. et al v. Platte Canyon School District No. 1 et al Doc. 78 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-03358-CMA-BNB C.S., an unemancipated person, through his parents and next of friends, Michael and Cynthia Schaffer, Plaintiff, v. PLATTE CANYON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.1, MIKE SCHMIDT, Individually, and MEGGIN STOUT, Individually, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Order on Denying Motion to Dismiss and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion for Summary Judgment of Judge Christine M. Arguello entered on September 23, 2014 it is ORDERED that this Court GRANTS IN PART Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 44) and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE all of Plaintiff’s federal claims. It further DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s state law claims. It further affirms the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Boland (Doc. No. 60). It is further ORDERED that this Court DENIES or OVERRULES the Defendant’s Motion to Dockets.Justia.com to Exclude (Doc. No. 70) and Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 71); Defendants’ Objections to the Recommendation (Doc. No. 61); and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 31). It is further Ordered that this case is DISMISSED. It is further Ordered that the Defendants shall have their costs by the filing of a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of this Court within fourteen (14) days of entry of judgment, and pursuant to the procedures set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 24th day of September, 2014. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ A. Thomas Deputy Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.