TOG, Inc. et al v. United States Postal Service et al, No. 1:2012cv01946 - Document 46 (D. Colo. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT. ORDERED that FINAL JUDGMENT on Plaintiffs antitrust claims IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs WITH PREJUDICE, and the Amended Complaint and this civil action are dismissed and closed by Clerk on 09/05/13. (jjhsl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
TOG, Inc. et al v. United States Postal Service et al Doc. 46 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No.: 12-cv-01946-JLK TOG, INC., and WILD HARVEST, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly-situated, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, INNOVATIONS GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation, and OMAR DAJANI, an individual, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Memorandum Opinion and Order (Docket No. 42) entered by Judge John L. Kane on July 3, 2013, incorporated herein by reference, it is ORDERED that Defendant United States Postal Service’s Motion To Dismiss the Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. No. 23) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant IGI’s Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) [Doc. No. 24] is DENIED as MOOT. It is FURTHER ORDERED that FINAL JUDGMENT on Plaintiffs’ antitrust claims IS HEREBY ENTERED in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiffs WITH 1 Dockets.Justia.com PREJUDICE, and the Amended Complaint and this civil action are dismissed and closed. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 5th day of September, 2013. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
