Reed v. Swingle et al, No. 1:2012cv01687 - Document 40 (D. Colo. 2012)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 38 Order on Report and Recommendations by Clerk on 12/13/2012. (klyon, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Reed v. Swingle et al Doc. 40 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-01687-MSK-MEH NORMAN RAY REED, JR., Plaintiff, v. RUDY SWINGLE, In his official and professional capacity, and NICHOLES, in his official and professional capacity, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Electronic Text-Only Order filed on December 7, 2012, adopting the Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #37) to dismiss the case without prejudice for failure to prosecute and follow the Court’s orders, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hegarty (Doc. #37) is ADOPTED and the Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action and for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s orders, and the case is hereby closed. It is further ORDERED that the defendants AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 13th day of December, 2012. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
