Templeton v. Fehn et al, No. 1:2012cv00859 - Document 147 (D. Colo. 2014)

Court Description: SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS ON 134 ORDER FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT re 144 : the Court's Order for Entry of Final Judgment 134 is supplemented to include the findings stated herein, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/23/2014. (jsmit)

Download PDF
Templeton v. Fehn et al Doc. 147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 12-cv-00859-RPM FORREST DARYL TEMPLETON, Plaintiff, v. H THOMAS FEHN, ORLY DAVIDI, GREGORY J. SHERWIN, FIELDS, FEHN & SHERWIN, a California General Partnership, DALE K. HALL, and CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants. SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS ON ORDER FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT On September 2, 2014, pursuant to the Court’s order, the clerk of court entered final judgment dismissing Plaintiff Daryl Templeton’s claim for negligent misrepresentation against Defendant Dale K. Hall. [Docs. 134 & 135.] Templeton has moved the Court to supplement its findings as to why final judgment is warranted on his claim against Hall. [Doc. 144.] Templeton claims that Hall negligently misrepresented facts concerning the settlement of the underlying arbitration hearing to Templeton, which Templeton relied upon to his detriment. This claim raises legal issues distinct from the issues raised by Templeton’s claims against the Attorney Defendants that remain before the court. It is unlikely that allowing Templeton’s appeal against Hall to proceed would require the Tenth Circuit Court Dockets.Justia.com of Appeals to duplicate its efforts or squander judicial resources. Further, Templeton is 76 years old and this case has been pending since April 3, 2012. After considering judicial administrative interests against Templeton’s interest in a prompt appeal, the Court concludes there is no just reason for delaying Templeton’s appeal against Hall. Upon the foregoing, it is ORDERED that the Court’s Order for Entry of Final Judgment [Doc. 134] is supplemented to include the findings stated herein. Dated: September 23, 2014 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch _____________________ Richard P. Matsch Senior District Judge 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.