Templeton v. Fehn et al, No. 1:2012cv00859 - Document 128 (D. Colo. 2014)

Court Description: ORDER FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b) re 116 : the Clerk shall enter a final judgment dismissing the plaintiffs claims against Catlin Specialty Insurance Company and granting Catlin's Specialty Insurance Company's counter claim declaring that Catlin Specialty Insurance Company has no duty under its policy to defend or indemnify plaintiff, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/11/2014.(jsmit)

Download PDF
Templeton v. Fehn et al Doc. 128 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 12-cv-00859-RPM FORREST DARYL TEMPLETON, Plaintiff, v. H. THOMAS FEHN, ORLY DAVIDI, GREGORY J. SHERWIN, FIELDS, FEHN & SHERWIN, CATLIN SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________________ ORDER FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 54(b) _____________________________________________________________________________ On June 24, 2014, this Court entered Judgment in favor of Catlin Specialty Insurance Company on Forest Daryl Templeton’ fifth and sixth claims for relief dismissing those clams from this civil action. On July 10, 2014, the plaintiff moved for entry of final judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Defendant Catlin Specialty Insurance Company filed a response on July 31, 2014, opposing that motion, pointing out that this Court did not expressly rule on its counterclaim in the Memorandum, Opinion and Order of June 24, 2014. That was remedied by this Court’s Order entered August 1, 2014 granting that counterclaim. Because there is now no just reason for delay of the appeal of the dismissal of the plaintiff’s claims against Catlin and granting Catlin’s counterclaim for declaratory judgment, it is ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter a final judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s claims against Catlin Specialty Insurance Company and granting Catlin’s Specialty Insurance Company’s counter claim declaring that Catlin Specialty Insurance Company has no duty under its policy to defend or indemnify plaintiff. DATED: August 11th, 2014 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch __________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.