USA v. Berryman et al, No. 1:2011cv02708 - Document 114 (D. Colo. 2015)
Court Description: ORDER granting 113 Unopposed Motion for Corrected Final Judgment under Rule 60(a). By Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 3/18/2015.(alowe)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
USA v. Berryman et al Doc. 114 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Wiley Y. Daniel Civil Action No. 11-cv-02708-WYD-KLM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NANCY D. BERRYMAN; THE TEMPLE OF THE UNVEILED GOD; THE OFFICE OF THE OVERSEER OF DEDICATION TO ENLIGHTENMENT; and HER SUCCESSORS, A CORPORATION SOLE, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR CORRECTED FINAL JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 60(a) THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the United States' Unopposed Motion for a Corrected Final Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) [ECF No. 111], filed March 16, 2015. For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the United States' Unopposed Motion for a Corrected Final Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) [ECF No. 111], filed March 16, 2015, is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk should correct the final judgment [ECF No. 107], so that it includes both the judgment against Defendant Berryman for the tax years 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006, in the amount of $142,595.58, plus other statutory additions from October 1, 2012, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and -1- Dockets.Justia.com 26 U.S.C. § 6621, until judgment is paid in full (ECF No. 77, p. 16), and the judgment against Defendant Berryman for the tax year 1997 in the amount of $395,136.63 as of December 2, 2013, plus other statutory additions from December 2, 2013, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. § 6621, until judgment is paid in full. (ECF No. 106, p. 8). Dated: March 18, 2015 BY THE COURT: /s/ Wiley Y. Daniel WILEY Y. DANIEL, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
