Hughes v. Kvasnicka et al, No. 1:2011cv02442 - Document 79 (D. Colo. 2014)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT. ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, Denver Police Officer Wesley Kvasnicka and The City and County of Denver, Jointly and Severally, and against Plaintiff, Joel Hughes, on Defendants Motion for Summary Judg ment. ORDERED that Defendants shall have their costs by the filing of a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of this Court within fourteen (14) days of entry of judgment, and pursuant to the procedures set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1 by Clerk on 01/07/14. (jjhsl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Hughes v. Kvasnicka et al Doc. 79 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02442-WYD-MJW JOEL HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. DENVER POLICE OFFICER WESLEY KVASNICKA; and THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Jointly and Severally, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Order on Summary Judgment, filed on January 6, 2014, by the Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants, Denver Police Officer Wesley Kvasnicka and The City and County of Denver, Jointly and Severally, and against Plaintiff, Joel Hughes, on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaint and action are dismissed. It is further ORDERED that Defendants shall have their costs by the filing of a Bill of Costs with the Clerk of this Court within fourteen (14) days of entry of judgment, and pursuant to the procedures set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. -1- Dockets.Justia.com DATED at Denver, Colorado this 7th day of January, 2014. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk -2-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
