Small v. Huddleston et al, No. 1:2011cv02337 - Document 68 (D. Colo. 2012)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 65 Order. By Clerk on 9/7/12. (mnfsl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Small v. Huddleston et al Doc. 68 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02337-MJW TYRON DUANTE SMALL, Plaintiff, v. DETECTIVE JEFF HUDDLESTON; DETECTIVE MARC CHACON; and OFFICER DANIEL THOMPSON, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the orders entered during the course of proceedings in this case, the following FINAL JUDGMENT is hereby entered. I. Pursuant to the Order to Dismiss in Part and to Draw Case to A District Judge and to a Magistrate Judge [Docket No. 19] filed by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on January 24, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is ORDERED that Defendant Colorado Springs Police Department is dismissed as a party to this action. II. Pursuant to the Order [Docket No. 65] filed on August 23, 2012 by the Honorable Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Prisoner Complaint [Docket No. 51] is GRANTED insofar as plaintiff’s claims are barred by the Dockets.Justia.com applicable statute of limitations. Accordingly, final judgment is hereby entered dismissing this action and all claims therein with prejudice in favor of Defendants Jeff Huddleston, Detective Marc Chacon, and Officer Daniel Thompson and against Plaintiff Tyrone Duante Small. It is further ORDERED that the defendants are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 7th day of September, 2012. FOR THE COURT: GREGORY C. LANGHAM, CLERK By: s/ Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk United States Magistrate Judge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
