Atencio v. King Soopers et al, No. 1:2011cv02195 - Document 34 (D. Colo. 2012)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 33 Order. By Clerk on 12/7/12. (mnfsl, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Atencio v. King Soopers et al Doc. 34 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02195-PAB-MEH MARSHA ATENCIO, Plaintiff, v. KING SOOPERS, ANN PIERCE, SCOTT BRINSON, NASH FORACI, and CHARLES BIGLEN, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered. Pursuant to the Order of Judge Philip A. Brimmer entered on December 5, 2012 it is ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment and Incorporated Brief [Docket No. 17] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s first and fourth claims for relief are dismissed without prejudice as preempted by § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 et seq. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the case is remanded to the District Court for the City and County of Denver, where it was originally filed as Civil Action 2011 CV 4619. It is Dockets.Justia.com FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant King Soopers, Ann Pierce, Scott Brinson, Nash Foraci, and Charles Biglen are AWARDED their costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. Dated at Denver, Colorado this 7th day of December, 2012. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler Deputy Clerk
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
