Parker v. Maus et al, No. 1:2011cv01777 - Document 46 (D. Colo. 2012)

Court Description: ORDER amending 44 Order Adopting Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Amended as set forth in the attached order. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to amend the Final Judgment [#45], filed September 26, 2012, to reflect this correction. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/27/12. (kfinn, )

Download PDF
Parker v. Maus et al Doc. 46 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 11-cv-01777-REB-CBS TRENTON T. PARKER, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL S. MAUS, in his individual and official capacity, ELIZABETH B. STROBEL, individually and in her official capacity, BRUCE T. BARKER, in his individual and official capacity, STEPHANIE L. ARRIES, in her individual and official capacity, JOHN COOK, in his individual and official capacity, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO In Re Case No. 07-cv-189; and Case No. 11-cv-19, IN WELD COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO, Defendants. ORDER Blackburn, J. This matter comes before me sua sponte. It has come to the court’s attention that there is a clerical error in my prior Order Adopting Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [#44], filed September 25, 2012. I enter this order to correct that error and direct amendment of the judgment in accordance therewith. No substantive changes are intended by these amendments. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That paragraph 4.a. at page 2 of the court’s Order Adopting Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [#44], filed September 25, 2012, is AMENDED to read as follows: Dockets.Justia.com “4. That plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED as follows: a. The claims against defendants Maus and Strobel in both their official and individual capacities are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;” and 2. That the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to amend the Final Judgment [#45], filed September 26, 2012, to reflect this correction. Dated September 27, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.