Wingfield v. Robinson et al, No. 1:2010cv01375 - Document 117 (D. Colo. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER. The Motion for Clarification of Order Adopting Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge 114 and Final Judgment 115 by Defendant Thompson 116 filed 11/1/2011, is GRANTED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/3/2011.(sah, )
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Wingfield v. Robinson et al Doc. 117 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 10-cv-01375-REB-KLM JOSHUA E. WINGFIELD, Plaintiff, v. SHERIFF J. GRAYSON ROBINSON, NURSE McMILLAN, NURSE EPHRAIM, NURSE LUCIENDA, NURSE ROY, ELAYNE MEYERS, DEPUTY CARTER, DEPUTY EMERSON, and DR. THOMPSON, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION Blackburn, J. The matter before me is the Motion for Clarification of Order Adopting Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. #114] and Final Judgment [Doc. #115] by Defendant Thompson [#116]1 filed November 1, 2011. I grant the motion and clarify that the claims against defendant Thompson are dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Motion for Clarification of Order Adopting Recommendation of 1 “[#116]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. Dockets.Justia.com the United States Magistrate Judge [Doc. #114] and Final Judgment [Doc. #115] by Defendant Thompson [#116] filed November 1, 2011, is GRANTED; 2. That my Order Overruling Objections to and Adopting Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [#114], filed October 28, 2011, is AMENDED at page 3, ¶ 6 to read as follows: That judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendants, Sheriff J. Grayson Robinson, Roy McMillan (identified in the caption as “Nurse McMillan” and “Nurse Roy”), Efrain Ubinas (identified in the caption as “Nurse “Ephraim”), Lucia Azocar (identified in the caption as “Nurse Lucienda”), Elaine Meyer (identified in the caption as “Elayne Meyers”), Genor Carter (identified in the caption as “Deputy Carter”), Logan Emerson (identified in the caption as “Deputy Emerson”), and James Thompson (identified in the caption as “Dr. Thompson”), against plaintiff, Joshua E. Wingfield, as to all claims for relief and causes of action; provided, that the judgment as to the claims against these defendants shall be with prejudice; 3. That the Final Judgment [#115] filed November 1, 2011, is AMENDED to reflect this amendment to the order of the court. Dated November 3, 2011, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
