Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rivelli et al, No. 1:2005cv01039 - Document 203 (D. Colo. 2010)

Court Description: Final Judgment as to Defendant Teresa W. Ayers 198 . ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 08/12/10.(jjh, )

Download PDF
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rivelli et al Doc. 203 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 05-cv-1039 RPM SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. LOUIS E. RIVELLI, RODNEY B. JOHNSON, STEPHEN G. BURKE, TERESA W. AYERS, CRAIG L. STEVENSON, and ROBERT T. HOFFMAN, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT TERESA W. AYERS ________________________________________________________________________ The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and Defendant Teresa W. Ayers having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment: I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant's agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) Rule 13b2-1 [17 C.F.R. §§ 240.13b2-1] by: 1 Dockets.Justia.com (a) Directly or indirectly falsifying or causing to be falsified any book, record or account subject to Section 13(b)(2)(A) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78m(b)(2)(A)]; II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant and Defendant's agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from aiding and abetting any violations of Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 78m(a), 78m(b)(2)(A) and 78m(b)(2)(B)] and Rules 12b-20 and 13a13 thereunder [17 C.F.R. §§ 240.12b-20 and 240.13a-13], by knowingly providing substantial assistance to an issuer that: (b) fails to file with the Commission any report or statement required to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or information and documents required by the Commission to keep reasonably current the information and documents required to be included in or filed with an application or registration statement filed pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act; (c) fails, in addition to the information expressly required to be included in a statement or report, to add such further material information as is necessary to make the required statements, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made not misleading; 2 (d) fails to make and keep books, records, and accounts, which, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets of the issuer; or (e) fails to devise and maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurances that: transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization; transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles or any other criteria applicable to such statements, and to maintain accountability for assets; access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization; and the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. III. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant shall pay a civil penalty in the amount of $25,000 pursuant to Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act. Defendant shall make this payment within fourteen (14) days after entry of this Final Judgment by certified check, bank cashier's check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The payment shall be delivered or mailed to the Office of Financial Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, Operations Center, 6432 General Green Way, Mail Stop 0-3, Alexandria, Virginia 22312, and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying Teresa W. Ayers as a defendant in this action; setting forth the title and civil action number of this action and the name of this 3 Court; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendant shall pay post-judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 USC § 1961. The Commission shall remit the funds paid pursuant to this paragraph to the United States Treasury. IV. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendant shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. V. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. VI. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. Dated: August 12th, 2010 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch _________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge 4

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.