Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al, No. 5:2010cv03428 - Document 1026 (N.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: REVISED STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT, re 1024 . Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 6/10/2013. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2013)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al v. A10 Networks, Inc. et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 MENLO PAR K ATTO RNEY S AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP 10 13 14 15 Doc. 1026 ALLEN J. RUBY (SBN 47109) allen.ruby@skadden.com SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: 650-470-4500 Facsimile: 650-470-4570 FABIO E. MARINO (SBN 183825) fmarino@mwe.com McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004 Telephone: 650-815-7400 Facsimile: 6508-15-7401 DENISE MINGRONE (SBN 135224) dmingrone@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-740 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN JOSE DIVISION 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-03428 PSG REVISED [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual; RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and STEVE HWANG, an individual, Defendant and Counterclaimants. 27 28 REVISED [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG Dockets.Justia.com 1 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 2 1. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs Brocade Communications 3 Systems, Inc. (“Brocade”) and Foundry Networks, LLC (“Foundry”) against Defendant A10 4 Networks, Inc. (“A10 Networks”), for the amount of $75,000,000.00 (seventy-five million U.S. 5 dollars). 6 2. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Individual Defendants Lee Chen, 7 Rajkumar Jalan, Ronald Szeto, Steve Hwang, Liang Han (collectively, “Individual Defendants”) 8 on all claims by Brocade and Foundry against the Individual Defendants. 9 3. Brocade and Foundry will forebear from execution of this Stipulated Final and Annex A thereto. Upon fulfillment by A10 of all financial, dismissal and withdrawal terms 12 MENLO PAR K Judgment so long as A10 is not in breach of the Binding Term Sheet executed on May 20, 2013 11 ATTO RNEY S AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP 10 (including at least paragraphs 1-5) of the Binding Term Sheet and Annex A thereto, Brocade and 13 Foundry shall file an Acknowledgement Re Satisfaction of Judgment and [Proposed] Order in the 14 form attached as Exhibit A hereto, and the permanent injunctions entered on January 10, 2013 15 and January 23, 2013 (as modified by the Court’s order of February 12, 2013) shall be dissolved 16 at such time. 17 4 This Stipulated Final Judgment is enforceable and non-appealable. This Stipulated 18 Final Judgment represents a final judgment regarding all claims, counterclaims, and defenses that 19 were or could have been raised in this action by Brocade, Foundry and/or A10. 20 5. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Stipulated Final Judgment in 21 accordance with the terms of, and to enforce the terms of, the parties' Binding Term Sheet dated 22 May 20, 2013. 23 6 Each Party to bear its own fees and costs. 24 25 26 27 28 -2- REVISED [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG 1 Dated: June 7, 2013 MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 2 /s/ Fabio E. Marino FABIO E. MARINO Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC 3 4 5 6 Dated: June 7, 2013 7 /s/ Annette L. Hurst ANNETTE L. HURST Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. AND FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC 8 9 11 Dated: June 7, 2013 12 MENLO PAR K ATTO RNEY S AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP 10 14 16 Dated: June 7, 2013 18 20 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP /s/ Mark A. Flagel MARK A. FLAGEL Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants A10 NETWORKS, INC., 17 19 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP /s/ Scott R. Mosko SCOTT R. MOSKO Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants A10 NETWORKS, INC., LEE CHEN, RAJKUMAR JALAN, RON SZETO, AND STEVE HWANG 13 15 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP Dated: June 7, 2013 LOSCH & EHRLICH /s/ Joseph Ehrlich JOSEPH EHRLICH Attorneys for Defendant LIANG HAN 21 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: June 10, 2013 26 27 Hon. Paul Singh Grewal United States Magistrate Judge 28 -3- REVISED [PROPOSED] STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG Exhibit A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 MENLO PAR K ATTO RNEY S AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP 10 13 14 15 ALLEN J. RUBY (SBN 47109) allen.ruby@skadden.com SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: 650-470-4500 Facsimile: 650-470-4570 FABIO E. MARINO (SBN 183825) fmarino@mwe.com McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004 Telephone: 650-815-7400 Facsimile: 6508-15-7401 DENISE MINGRONE (SBN 135224) dmingrone@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-740 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN JOSE DIVISION 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, v. A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual; RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and STEVE HWANG, an individual, Defendant and Counterclaimants. Case No. 5:10-cv-03428 PSG ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT FILED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH 27 28 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG 1 Plaintiffs Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. and Foundry Networks, LLC 2 (collectively “Plaintiffs”), located at 130 Holger Way, San Jose, CA 95134, hereby acknowledge 3 the satisfaction of the Revised Stipulated Final Judgment entered by the Court on June ___, 2013 4 (Dkt. ___), by defendant A10 Networks, Inc. (“A10”), located at 3 West Plumeria Drive, San 5 Jose, CA 95134. 6 7 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that the Court enter the [Proposed] Order regarding Satisfaction of Judgment filed concurrently herewith. 8 9 11 12 MENLO PAR K ATTO RNEY S AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 MENLO PAR K ATTO RNEY S AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP 10 13 14 15 ALLEN J. RUBY (SBN 47109) allen.ruby@skadden.com SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 Palo Alto, CA 94301 Telephone: 650-470-4500 Facsimile: 650-470-4570 FABIO E. MARINO (SBN 183825) fmarino@mwe.com McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 275 Middlefield Road, Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004 Telephone: 650-815-7400 Facsimile: 6508-15-7401 DENISE MINGRONE (SBN 135224) dmingrone@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025-4004 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-740 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC. and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN JOSE DIVISION 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and FOUNDRY NETWORKS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants, v. Case No. 5:10-cv-03428 PSG REVISED [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT A10 NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation; LEE CHEN, an individual; RAJKUMAR JALAN; an individual; RON SZETO, an individual; DAVID CHEUNG, an individual; LIANG HAN, an individual; and STEVE HWANG, an individual, Defendant and Counterclaimants. 28 REVISED [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. Plaintiffs Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. (“Brocade”) and Foundry 3 Networks, LLC (“Foundry”) have acknowledged that A10 Networks, Inc. (“A10”) has fully 4 satisfied the terms of the Stipulated Final Judgment entered by the Court on June ___, 2013 (Dkt. 5 ___). 6 2. Accordingly, the clerk of this Court shall enter this Satisfaction of Judgment. 7 3. The patent permanent injunction entered on January 10, 2013 (Dkt. 830) and the 8 trade secret permanent injunction entered on January 23, 2013 (Dkt. 848) (as modified by the 9 Court’s order of February 12, 2013) are hereby DISSOLVED and of no further force or effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 MENLO PAR K ATTO RNEY S AT LAW M C D ERMOTT W ILL & E MERY LLP 10 13 Dated: Hon. Paul Singh Grewal United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- REVISED [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT CASE NO. 5:10-CV-03428 PSG
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
