Shloss v. Sweeney et al, No. 5:2006cv03718 - Document 49 (N.D. Cal. 2007)

Court Description: STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d Defendants' Statement of Recent Decision in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative to Strike, Carol Loeb Shloss's Amended Complaint filed bySean Sweeney, The Estate of James Joyce. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit "A" to Defendants' Statement of Recent Decision)(Nelson, Maria) (Filed on 1/11/2007)

Download PDF
Shloss v. Sweeney et al Doc. 49 Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW 1 2 3 4 5 Document 49 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 1 of 2 Maria K. Nelson (State Bar No. 155,608) mknelson@jonesday.com Anna E. Raimer (State Bar No. 234,794) aeraimer@jonesday.com JONES DAY 555 South Flower Street Fiftieth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2300 Telephone: (213) 489-3939 Facsimile: (213) 243-2539 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants SEà N SWEENEY AND THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 CAROL LOEB SHLOSS, 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 v. SEà N SWEENEY, in his capacity as trustee of the Estate of James Joyce, and THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE, Defendants. 17 18 Case No. CV 06-3718 JW HRLx DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE TO STRIKE, CAROL LOEB SHLOSS S AMENDED COMPLAINT Date: Time: Judge: January 29, 2007 9:00 a.m. The Honorable James Ware 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAI-2841731v1 Case No. C06-3718 JW HRL STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:06-cv-03718-JW Document 49 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 Defendants Seán Sweeney and the Estate of James Joyce (hereinafter Defendants ) 2 respectfully submit, pursuant to Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 7-3(d), this 3 Statement of Recent Decision in support of Defendants Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative 4 to Strike, Carol Loeb Shloss s Complaint. The Northern District of California has recently issued 5 an Order granting a Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in a similar case. 6 See Sandisk Corp. v. Audio MPEG, Inc., et al., No. C-06-02655 RMW (N.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2007) 7 (Exhibit A). 8 9 Dated: January 11, 2007 Respectfully submitted, JONES DAY 10 11 By: 12 13 /s/ Maria K. Nelson Counsel for Defendants SEà N SWEENEY AND THE ESTATE OF JAMES JOYCE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAI-2841731v1 -2- Case No. C06-3718 JW HRL STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.