Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc., No. 5:2003cv05340 - Document 46 (N.D. Cal. 2004)
Court Description: STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d Re Pending Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims and Third-Party Claims filed byGoogle Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Grewal, Ravind) (Filed on 12/21/2004)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Google Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF 1 2 3 4 Doc. 46 Document 46 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 1 of 2 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP MICHAEL H. PAGE - #154913 MARK A. LEMLEY - #155830 RAVIND S. GREWAL - #220543 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant GOOGLE INC. and Third-Party Defendants ASK JEEVES, INC. and EARTHLINK, INC. 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 GOOGLE INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc.; and DOES 1100, inclusive, Case No. C 03-5340-JF (EAI) STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION RE PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS Date: Judge: December 21, 2004 Hon. Jeremy Fogel 17 Defendants. 18 19 AMERICAN BLIND & WALLPAPER FACTORY, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a decoratetoday.com, Inc. 20 Counterclaimant, 21 v. 22 23 24 GOOGLE INC., AMERICA ONLINE, INC., NETSCAPE COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, COMPUSERVE INTERACTIVE SERVICES, INC., ASK JEEVES, INC., and EARTHLINK, INC., 25 26 Counterdefendants/ Third-Party Defendants. 27 28 344492.01 STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (EAI) Dockets.Justia.com Case 5:03-cv-05340-JF Document 46 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 2 of 2 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(d), Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Google Inc. ( Google ) 2 gives notice to the Court that Judge Leonie Brinkema, in Gov t Employees Ins. Co. v. Google 3 Inc., Civil Action No. 1:04cv507 (E.D. Va.), recently granted judgment as a matter of law in 4 Google s favor on the plaintiff s claim that Google s use of its trademark as an advertising 5 keyword violates the Lanham Act. Google attaches as Exhibit A the relevant portions of a 6 December 15, 2004 hearing in the Gov t Employees case at which Judge Brinkema entered her 7 oral ruling. Google will submit Judge Brinkema s written decision to the Court as soon as it is 8 available. 9 Dated: December 21, 2004 KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 10 11 12 13 14 By: /S/ Ravind S. Grewal RAVIND S. GREWAL Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant GOOGLE INC. and Third-Party Defendants ASK JEEVES, INC. and EARTHLINK, INC. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 344492.01 STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION CASE NO. C 03-5340-JF (EAI)
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
