Cygnus Telecommunications Technology v. Dial-Thru International, No. 5:2002cv00142 - Document 300 (N.D. Cal. 2008)

Court Description: AMENDED ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF MARCH 30, 2007 ORDER. Signed by Judge Whyte on 11/13/08. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008)

Download PDF
Cygnus Telecommunications Technology v. Dial-Thru International Doc. 300 1 2 E-FILED on 11/13/08 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 10 IN RE 11 CYGNUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY, LLC, PATENT LITIGATION MDL No. 1423 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 No. C-02-00142-RMW No. C-02-00145-RMW No. C-02-05437-RMW No. C-03-05758-RMW No. C-03-03378-RMW No. C-03-03594-RMW No. C-03-03596-RMW No. C-03-04003-RMW No. C-04-03001-RMW No. C-04-03365-RMW No. C-04-04247-RMW No. C-04-04359-RMW No. C-06-03843 RMW No. C-02-00142-RMW No. C-06-04295 RMW No. C-06-06479 RMW 20 21 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF MARCH 30,2007 ORDER 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF MARCH 30, 2007 ORDER C-06-03843 RMW, C-06-04295 RMW, C-06-06479 RMW Dockets.Justia.com 1 On October 24, 2008, Plaintiff Cygnus Telecommunications Technology, LLC ("Cygnus") 2 moved for an order clarifying this court's March 30, 2007 order on defendants' motion for summary 3 judgment. Previously, on September 22, 2008, counsel for Cygnus made a similar request by letter and 4 filed the current motion because he had not received a response to the letter request. The court had 5 responded, a copy of which is attached, but, inadvertently, a copy was not sent to Cygnus's counsel. The 6 court apologizes for this oversight. Nonetheless, after considering Cygnus' motion, the court denies the 7 request. 8 9 10 11 DATED: 11/13/08 RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF MARCH 30, 2007 ORDER C-06-03843 RMW, C-06-04295 RMW, C-06-06479 RMW 2 1 Notice of this document has been electronically sent to: 2 Counsel for Plaintiff: John Sutton johnpsutton@earthlink.net 3 4 5 6 7 Counsel for Defendants: Allison Cammack acammack@crgplaw.com John Carey jcarey@crgplaw.com John F. Mardula jmardula@globe-ip.com Jeffrey L. Silvestrini jeff@crslaw.com Thomas T. Tamlyn , Jr. tamlyn@yeskoolaw.com Peter S. Canelias pcanelias@canelias.com Kieran Patrick Fallon fallon@kfallonlaw.com Gregory B. Wood gwood@fulbright.com 8 Notice of this document was sent to: 9 Counsel for Defendant: 10 11 12 13 Matthew Francis McGahren Baum & McGahren 6171 Crooked Creek Road Norcross , GA 30092 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel that have not registered for e-filing under the court's CM/ECF program. 14 15 16 Dated: 17 11/13/08 JAS Chambers of Judge Whyte 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION OF MARCH 30, 2007 ORDER C-06-03843 RMW, C-06-04295 RMW, C-06-06479 RMW 3 Attachment

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.