Tien aka Angela Tien v. United Airlines, Inc. et al, No. 4:2023cv02622 - Document 32 (N.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Jeffrey S. White denying 16 Motion to Remand; finding as moot 14 Motion to Dismiss. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2023)

Download PDF
Tien aka Angela Tien v. United Airlines, Inc. et al Doc. 32 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND , 14 See BACKGROUND Dockets.Justia.com Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. See generally id. see also ANALYSIS A. Applicable Legal Standards. Franchise Tax Bd. v. Constr. Laborers Vacation Trust see also See, e.g., Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am. Valdez v. Allstate Ins. Co. see also Gaus v. Miles, Inc. Gaus Id. Morris v. Princess Cruises, Inc. McCabe v. General Foods Corp. B. United Has Met Its Burden to Show Ms. Espinoza is Fraudulently Joined. Id. Hunter v. Philip Morris USA Smallwood v. Illinois Cent. R.R. Co. Grancare, LLC v. Thrower Hunter see also Ritchey v. Upjohn Drug. Co. Lawler v. Montblanc N.Am., LLC Aguilar v. Avis Rent-a-Car Sys., Inc. if unreasonably Id. See or pervasive Brooks v. City of San Mateo severe Hughes v. Pair Mintz v. Blue Cross of Cal. Janken v. GM Hughes Elec. or Id. Roby v. McKesson Corp. see also Croft v. GTT Commc’ns Quigley v. United Airlines C. United Has Met Its Burden to Show the Amount in Controversy Exceeds $75,000. Chavez v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. inter alia, see also id. Croft IT IS SO ORDERED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.