Thomas v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company, No. 4:2023cv00065 - Document 27 (N.D. Cal. 2023)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting 20 Motion to Dismiss. Amended Pleadings due by 9/29/2023. (kkp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Dockets.Justia.com ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND BACKGROUND Thomas v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company Id. Doc. 27 See ANALYSIS A. Applicable Legal Standard. Lazy Y Ranch Ltd. v. Behrens se pro See Erickson v. Pardus Balisteri v. Pacifica Police Dept. pro se pro se Pena v. Gardner Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly Papasan v. Allain Twombly Id. Ashcroft v. Iqbal Twombly See, e.g., Reddy v. Litton Indus. Inc. Cook, Perkiss & Liehe, Inc. v. N. Cal. Collection Serv., Inc. pro se Ahktar v. Mesa Shucker v. Rockwood B. The Court Dismisses the Federal Claims with Leave to Amend, in Part. 1. The Court Dismisses the Dodd-Frank Claim Without Leave to Amend. See Id. Id. Id. Id. Id. 2. The Court Dismisses the Title VII Claim With Leave to Amend. see also Scholar v. Pacific Bell Abikar v. Bristol Bay Native Corp. Payan v. Aramark Mgmt. Servs. Ltd. P’ship Scholar See Abikar See C. The Court Dismisses the State Law Claims With Leave to Amend, in Part. et seq. IT IS SO ORDERED 6
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
