Crump v. Hyatt Corporation, No. 4:2020cv00295 - Document 79 (N.D. Cal. 2023)

Court Description: STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT RE DOCKET NO. 78 . ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 2/212023. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/21/2023)

Download PDF
Crump v. Hyatt Corporation Doc. 79 Case 4:20-cv-00295-HSG Document 79 Filed 02/21/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 R. Rex Parris (SBN 96567) rrparris@parrislawyers.com Alexander R. Wheeler (SBN 239541) awheeler@parrislawyers.com Kitty K. Szeto (SBN 258136) kszeto@parrislawyers.com Ryan A. Crist (SBN 316653) rcrist@parrislawyers.com PARRIS LAW FIRM 43364 10th Street West Lancaster, California 93534 T: (661) 949-2595 / F: (661) 949-7524 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Settlement Class SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Brian P. Long (SBN 232746) bplong@seyfarth.com 601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 3300 Los Angeles, California 90017 T: (213) 270-9600 / F: (213) 270-9601 15 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Michael Afar (SBN 298990) mafar@seyfarth.com 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, California 90067 T: (310) 277-7200 / F: (310) 201-5219 16 Attorneys for Defendant HYATT CORPORATION 13 14 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 22 CHRISTINE CRUMP, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated and on behalf of other aggrieved employees pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act; Plaintiff, 23 24 v. 26 HYATT CORPORATION, an unknown business entity; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 27 Defendants. 25 28 ) Case No. 4:20-cv-00295-HSG ) ) CLASS ACTION ) ) STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) _____________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:20-cv-00295-HSG Document 79 Filed 02/21/23 Page 2 of 2 1 The Court, having granted final approval of the Joint Stipulation of Class Action 2 Settlement and Release of Claims (“Settlement Agreement”) as set forth in the Order Granting 3 Motion for Final Approval and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion for Attorneys’ Fees 4 (Dkt. No. 77) (“Final Approval Order”), hereby enters this Stipulated Final Judgment 5 (“Judgment”) as follows: 6 1. The Court hereby enters judgment in the above-entitled action for Plaintiff 7 Christine Crump and the 15,774 Settlement Class Members as defined in the Settlement 8 Agreement and in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement and Final Approval 9 Order. 10 2. The Settlement Agreement, Final Approval Order, and this Judgment binds 11 Plaintiff Christine Crump and all 15,774 Settlement Class Members who did not timely submit a 12 Request for Exclusion from the Settlement. 13 3. Plaintiff Christine Crump and all 15,774 Settlement Class Members are hereby 14 permanently enjoined from pursuing or seeking to reopen claims that have been released by the 15 Settlement Agreement and Final Approval Order. 16 4. The 96 individuals identified in Exhibit “A” who submitted a timely Request for 17 Exclusion from the Settlement Agreement are hereby excluded from the Settlement Agreement, 18 Final Approval Order, and this Judgment. The Settlement Agreement, the releases set forth in 19 the Settlement Agreement, the Final Approval Order, and this Judgment are not binding on the 20 96 individuals identified in Exhibit “A.” 21 22 5. The Court hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over the enforcement of this Judgment. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 DATE: 2/21/2023 Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. United States District Court 27 28 1 _____________________________________________________________________________ STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.