Schneider et al v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., No. 4:2016cv02200 - Document 234 (N.D. Cal. 2020)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL ***Civil Case Terminated.*** This judgment/order terminates docket no. 233 . Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 11/18/2020. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2020)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Schneider et al v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. Doc. 234 Case 4:16-cv-02200-HSG Document 234 Filed 11/18/20 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARTIN SCHNEIDER, et al., Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL, INC., Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 16-cv-02200-HSG 12 13 1. Judgment in this matter is entered in accordance with, and incorporates by 14 reference the findings of, the Court’s Order Granting Motion for Final Settlement Approval, and 15 Grant in Part and Denying in Part Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Incentive Awards (the “Final 16 Approval Order”) (Dkt. 232 and hereby adopted and incorporated by reference into this Stipulated 17 Final Judgment as if stated herein in full). All capitalized terms used herein shall have the same 18 meaning as defined in the Settlement Agreement (Dkt. 205-2) and the Final Approval Order. 19 2. Having granted final approval of the settlement and granted Class Counsel’s 20 request for attorneys’ fees in the amount of $1,950,000 and costs in the amount of $636,556.28, 21 the Court hereby dismisses with prejudice the claims of the Class Representatives and the 22 Settlement Class, and enters Final Judgment in this action. All Settlement Class Members are 23 bound by this Final Judgment and are barred from pursuing, or seeking to reopen, any of the 24 Released Claims. The individual who opted out (identified at Dkt. No. 226-2) is not part of the 25 Settlement Class. 26 3. Without affecting the finality of the Final Judgment, the Court shall retain 27 exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over the above-captioned action and the parties, including all 28 Settlement Class Members, for purposes of enforcing the terms of the Final Judgment. Dockets.Justia.com Case 4:16-cv-02200-HSG Document 234 Filed 11/18/20 Page 2 of 2 1 This order terminates Dkt. No. 233: the Court need not and does not repeat or “reaffirm” 2 any aspect of the Final Approval Order for purposes of simply entering judgment. 3 This final judgment/order of dismissal terminates Docket No. 233. 4 5 6 7 8 JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED. Dated: 11/18/2020 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
