Halbrecht v. Jacobson et al, No. 4:2013cv03492 - Document 57 (N.D. Cal. 2015)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT [AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT]. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 8/21/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2015)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Halbrecht v. Jacobson et al Doc. 57 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 8 Case No. 13-cv-03492-YGR MARISSA HALBRECHT Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT vs. 9 10 11 JESSICA JACOBSON, RAYAH LEVY, and ARTEQUESTA 12 *AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT* Defendants. 13 14 15 Consistent with this Court’s Minute Order enforcing the parties’ settlement agreement 16 (Dkt 55), and Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED: 17 1. JUDGMENT is entered against Defendants Rayah Levy, Rayah Levy 18 International, Inc. (also known as Artequesta), and Jessica Jacobson, jointly and severally, in the 19 amount of three hundred and ninety four thousand dollars ($394,000) pursuant to the parties’ 20 Stipulation and Settlement Agreement. Plaintiff Marissa Halbrecht shall recover this amount, 21 jointly and severally, from Defendants. Plaintiff shall also recover from Defendants, jointly and 22 severally, pre-judgment interest at a rate of ten percent (10%), or one hundred and seven dollars 23 and ninety five cents ($107.95) per day, from May 22, 2014 through the date this Judgment is 24 entered. 25 2. JUDGMENT is also entered against Rayah Levy and Rayah Levy International, 26 Inc. (also known as Artequesta), jointly and severally, in the additional amount of $9,000. 27 Plaintiff shall recover this amount, jointly and severally, from Defendants Rayah Levy and Rayah 28 Levy International, Inc. Plaintiff shall also recover from Rayah Levy and Rayah Levy FINAL JUDGMENT Dockets.Justia.com 1 International, Inc. pre-judgment interest at a rate of ten percent (10%), or two dollars and forty- 2 seven ($2.47) per day, from May 22, 2014 through the date this Judgment is entered. 3 4 5 6 3. Plaintiff shall recover her costs of suit and reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in enforcing the settlement agreement. 4. The Court will retain jurisdiction of this matter to ensure compliance with this Judgment and the parties’ Settlement Agreement for a period of one year. 7 8 9 August 21 Dated: ____________________, 2015 United States District Court Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2FINAL JUDGMENT
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
