Orsolini et al v. Mead Clark Lumber Co. et al, No. 4:2010cv04478 - Document 50 (N.D. Cal. 2012)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT entered in accordance with the Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement; Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Incentive Awards to named Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong, on 8/13/12. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2012) Modified on 8/13/2012 (jlm, COURT STAFF).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Orsolini et al v. Mead Clark Lumber Co. et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Doc. 50 TERESA S. RENAKER (State Bar #187800) LINDSAY NAKO (State Bar #239090) JULIE WILENSKY (State Bar #271765) LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, P.C. 476 9th Street Oakland, CA 94607 Telephone: (510) 839-6824 Facsimile: (510) 839-7839 Email: trenaker@lewisfeinberg.com lnako@lewisfeinberg.com jwilensky@lewisfeinberg.com J. TIMOTHY NARDELL (State Bar #184444) NARDELL CHITSAZ & ASSOCIATES LLP 790 Mission Avenue San Rafael, California 94901 Telephone: (415) 485-2200 Facsimile: (415) 457-1420 Email: tim@ncalegal.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Class 13 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 OAKLAND DIVISION 17 18 19 MARIO L. ORSOLINI and ANDREW M. LEVINE, [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Plaintiffs, 20 21 Case No. C-10-04478 SBA vs. 23 MEAD CLARK LUMBER CO. AKA MEAD CLARK LUMBER COMPANY, INC., and RANDAL J. DESTRUEL, 24 Defendants. 22 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to the Court’s July 25, 2012 Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action 3 Settlement; Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Incentive Awards to Named Plaintiffs; and Entry of Final 4 Judgment (Dkt. 48), and Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Incentive 5 Awards for Named Plaintiffs (Dkt. 47), it is hereby ordered that judgment in this matter is entered in 6 accordance with the Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action Settlement; Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, 7 and Incentive Awards to Named Plaintiffs; and Entry of Final Judgment, and the Parties’ Stipulation 8 and Agreement of Settlement. 9 The above-captioned action is dismissed with prejudice. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: 8/13/1 14 Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT CASE NO. C-10-04478 SBA 1
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
