VanHattem v. United Mortgage Group Inc. et al, No. 4:2008cv01065 - Document 89 (N.D. Cal. 2009)
Court Description: STIPULATION AND ORDER REPLACING EXHIBIT 3 TO THE FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT re 88 Stipulation, filed by Rebecca VanHattem, Infinite Shakim Allah, Genia Castillo. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 3/23/09. (nah, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2009)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
VanHattem v. United Mortgage Group Inc. et al 1 Doc. 89 Counsel Listed on Following Pages 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Rebecca VanHattem and Genia Castillo, individually, on behalf of others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, Plaintiffs, v. CASE NO: CV-08-01065 PJH STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER REPLACING EXHIBIT 3 TO THE FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT United Mortgage Group, Inc., Parminder Johal, Peter Johal a/k/a/ Petr Johal, and DOES 1-10 inclusive, 20 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NICHOLS KASTER, LLP Matthew C. Helland, CA State Bar No. 250451 Helland@nka.com One Embarcadero Center, Suite 720 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 277-7235 Facsimile: (415) 277-7238 NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP Donald H. Nichols, MN State Bar No. 78918 Nichols@nka.com (admitted pro hac vice) Paul J. Lukas, MN State Bar No. 22084X Lukas@nka.com (admitted pro hac vice) 4600 IDS Center, 80 S. 8th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 LEE & BRAZIEL, LLP J. Derek Braziel, Texas Bar No. 00793380 jdbraziel@l-b-law.com (admitted pro hac vice) 1801 N. Lamar St., Suite 325 Dallas, Texas 75202 BRUCKNER BURCH PLLC Richard J. (“Rex”) Burch, Texas Bar No. 24001807 rburch@brucknerburch.com (admitted pro hac vice) 1415 Louisiana St., Suite 2125 Houston, Texas 77002 ATTORNEYS FOR INDIVIDUAL AND REPRESENTATIVE PLAINTIFFS 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 LORI A. BOWMAN (State Bar No. 114664) lori.bowman@ogletreedeakins.com MARGARET H. GILLESPIE (State Bar No. 150072) margaret.gillespie@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 633 West Fifth Street, 53rd Floor Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 239-9800 Facsimile: (213) 239-9045 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED MORTGAGE GROUP, INC., PARMINDER JOHAL AND PETER JOHAL 28 -2STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER WHEREAS, the Court granted final approval of the Stipulation of Settlement 1 2 in this matter on January 29, 2009; 3 WHEREAS, in that order approving the settlement and entering final 4 judgment (Dkt. 85) the Court retained jurisdiction with respect to the 5 implementation and enforcement of the Stipulation of Settlement; WHEREAS, in that order the Court approved the allocation submitted to the 6 7 Court as Exhibit 3; 8 WHEREAS, Defendant United Mortgage Group, Inc. has alerted Plaintiffs’ 9 Counsel to irregularities in its data that resulted in approximately 10 class members 10 receiving credit for more days than they actually worked in positions included in 11 the lawsuit; 12 WHEREAS, the Court approved notices did not advise individual class 13 members of allocation amounts, meaning that class members were not advised of 14 the previous allocation through the notice process; WHEREAS, the parties have reallocated the settlement funds to correct the 15 16 error in the data; 17 WHEREAS, this reallocation results in higher payments to every class 18 member except for those who previously received credit for too many days worked. 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // -3STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties that the 2 spreadsheet attached hereto as Replacement Exhibit 3 shall replace the allocation 3 previously submitted to the Court as Exhibit 3 to the Parties’ Joint Supplemental 4 Memorandum Regarding Status Of Claim Form Return, and that Replacement 5 Exhibit 3 shall replace the Exhibit 3 referred to in Docket 85. 6 7 DATED: March 26, 2009 8 NICHOLS KASTER, LLP By: s/ Matthew C. Helland Matthew C. Helland 9 11 NICHOLS KASTER, PLLP LEE & BRAZIEL, LLP BRUCKNER BURCH PLLC 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Putative Class 10 13 14 15 DATED: March 26, 2009 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 16 By:___ s/Margaret H. Gillespie__ Margaret H. Gillespie Attorneys for Defendants UNITED MORTGAGE GROUP, INC., PARMINDER JOHAL, and PETER JOHAL 17 18 19 20 21 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Replacement Exhibit 3, attached to this stipulation, shall replace the Exhibit 23 3 referenced in the Final Judgment and Order Granting Final Approval Of 24 Settlement, Dkt. 85. S -4- R NIA A H ER FO Jud LI RT 28 ED ER _____________________________ O ORD IT IS S Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton ilton United States DistricthyCourtmJudge is J. Ha ge P ll NO 27 3/23/09 Dated: ____________ UNIT ED 26 RT U O 25 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T N F D IS T IC T O R STIPULATION AND [proposed] ORDER C REPLACEMENT EXHIBIT 3 Client ID Weeks Allocation 74 1 $33.81 92 1 $33.81 100 1 $33.81 114 1 $33.81 119 1 $33.81 135 1 $33.81 142 1 $33.81 158 1 $33.81 167 1 $33.81 171 1 $33.81 197 1 $33.81 223 1 $33.81 255 1 $33.81 304 1 $33.81 332 1 $33.81 339 1 $33.81 344 1 $33.81 430 1 $33.81 439 1 $33.81 460 1 $33.81 472 1 $33.81 511 1 $33.81 529 1 $33.81 533 1 $33.81 534 1 $33.81 536 1 $33.81 561 1 $33.81 563 1 $33.81 564 1 $33.81 596 1 $33.81 603 1 $33.81 610 1 $33.81 643 1 $33.81 650 1 $33.81 670 1 $33.81 678 1 $33.81 682 1 $33.81 688 1 $33.81 727 1 $33.81 729 1 $33.81 735 1 $33.81 757 1 $33.81 783 1 $33.81 822 1 $33.81 862 1 $33.81 99 2 $67.61 103 2 $67.61 125 2 $67.61 144 2 $67.61 2 $67.61 204 213 2 $67.61 219 2 $67.61 224 2 $67.61 262 2 $67.61 Client ID Weeks Allocation 273 2 $67.61 342 2 $67.61 359 2 $67.61 368 2 $67.61 372 2 $67.61 434 2 $67.61 447 2 $67.61 456 2 $67.61 457 2 $67.61 504 2 $67.61 518 2 $67.61 522 2 $67.61 593 2 $67.61 642 2 $67.61 691 2 $67.61 709 2 $67.61 714 2 $67.61 736 2 $67.61 775 2 $67.61 786 2 $67.61 816 2 $67.61 823 2 $67.61 44 3 $101.42 113 3 $101.42 146 3 $101.42 152 3 $101.42 196 3 $101.42 206 3 $101.42 268 3 $101.42 313 3 $101.42 336 3 $101.42 345 3 $101.42 351 3 $101.42 393 3 $101.42 406 3 $101.42 448 3 $101.42 449 3 $101.42 468 3 $101.42 469 3 $101.42 528 3 $101.42 625 3 $101.42 652 3 $101.42 658 3 $101.42 681 3 $101.42 698 3 $101.42 747 3 $101.42 764 3 $101.42 802 3 $101.42 843 3 $101.42 70 4 $135.22 4 $135.22 87 154 4 $135.22 188 4 $135.22 222 4 $135.22 Client ID Weeks Allocation 248 4 $135.22 288 4 $135.22 290 4 $135.22 308 4 $135.22 314 4 $135.22 386 4 $135.22 392 4 $135.22 404 4 $135.22 506 4 $135.22 516 4 $135.22 645 4 $135.22 749 4 $135.22 810 4 $135.22 834 4 $135.22 847 4 $135.22 909 4 $135.22 8 5 $169.03 64 5 $169.03 108 5 $169.03 122 5 $169.03 263 5 $169.03 270 5 $169.03 291 5 $169.03 341 5 $169.03 374 5 $169.03 387 5 $169.03 436 5 $169.03 446 5 $169.03 459 5 $169.03 478 5 $169.03 483 5 $169.03 484 5 $169.03 493 5 $169.03 555 5 $169.03 699 5 $169.03 767 5 $169.03 773 5 $169.03 780 5 $169.03 791 5 $169.03 840 5 $169.03 853 5 $169.03 1092 5 $169.03 16 6 $202.84 54 6 $202.84 132 6 $202.84 141 6 $202.84 220 6 $202.84 251 6 $202.84 340 6 $202.84 462 6 $202.84 6 $202.84 585 589 6 $202.84 594 6 $202.84 694 6 $202.84 Client ID Weeks Allocation 720 6 $202.84 9 7 $236.64 18 7 $236.64 20 7 $236.64 50 7 $236.64 80 7 $236.64 475 7 $236.64 495 7 $236.64 517 7 $236.64 570 7 $236.64 611 7 $236.64 656 7 $236.64 695 7 $236.64 718 7 $236.64 719 7 $236.64 768 7 $236.64 812 7 $236.64 828 7 $236.64 889 7 $236.64 921 7 $236.64 10 8 $270.45 89 8 $270.45 91 8 $270.45 96 8 $270.45 107 8 $270.45 115 8 $270.45 124 8 $270.45 507 8 $270.45 526 8 $270.45 568 8 $270.45 635 8 $270.45 684 8 $270.45 710 8 $270.45 784 8 $270.45 860 8 $270.45 26 9 $304.25 38 9 $304.25 83 9 $304.25 84 9 $304.25 185 9 $304.25 199 9 $304.25 209 9 $304.25 215 9 $304.25 443 9 $304.25 458 9 $304.25 512 9 $304.25 580 9 $304.25 601 9 $304.25 615 9 $304.25 657 9 $304.25 9 $304.25 830 43 10 $338.06 254 10 $338.06 278 10 $338.06 Client ID Weeks Allocation 281 10 $338.06 375 10 $338.06 410 10 $338.06 508 10 $338.06 619 10 $338.06 644 10 $338.06 884 10 $338.06 110 11 $371.86 256 11 $371.86 264 11 $371.86 306 11 $371.86 582 11 $371.86 600 11 $371.86 760 11 $371.86 870 11 $371.86 918 11 $371.86 934 11 $371.86 271 12 $405.67 360 12 $405.67 497 12 $405.67 544 12 $405.67 606 12 $405.67 648 12 $405.67 706 12 $405.67 1084 12 $405.67 28 13 $439.48 190 13 $439.48 192 13 $439.48 235 13 $439.48 355 13 $439.48 371 13 $439.48 424 13 $439.48 491 13 $439.48 655 13 $439.48 683 13 $439.48 759 13 $439.48 867 13 $439.48 53 14 $473.28 241 14 $473.28 1015 14 $473.28 1035 14 $473.28 1041 14 $473.28 1068 14 $473.28 293 15 $507.09 477 15 $507.09 602 15 $507.09 732 15 $507.09 744 15 $507.09 776 15 $507.09 1050 15 $507.09 15 $507.09 1074 1 16 $540.89 14 16 $540.89 191 16 $540.89 Client ID Weeks Allocation 730 16 $540.90 746 16 $540.89 1001 16 $540.89 66 17 $574.70 901 17 $574.70 890 18 $608.51 4 19 $642.31 912 19 $642.31 951 19 $642.31 968 19 $642.31 972 19 $642.31 986 19 $642.31 990 19 $642.31 1025 19 $642.31 1059 19 $642.31 1038 20 $676.12 902 21 $709.92 924 21 $709.92 952 21 $709.92 966 21 $709.92 979 21 $709.92 537 22 $743.73 910 22 $743.73 956 22 $743.73 970 22 $743.73 975 22 $743.73 995 22 $743.73 15 23 $777.53 927 23 $777.53 932 23 $777.53 963 23 $777.53 1009 23 $777.53 1044 23 $777.53 33 24 $811.34 944 24 $811.34 1037 24 $811.34 12 25 $845.15 876 25 $845.15 1012 25 $845.15 1018 25 $845.15 1028 25 $845.15 1069 25 $845.15 19 26 $878.95 34 26 $878.95 942 26 $878.95 1067 26 $878.95 1091 26 $878.95 52 27 $912.76 72 27 $912.76 964 27 $912.76 27 $912.76 1049 60 28 $946.56 873 28 $946.56 1030 28 $946.56 Client ID Weeks Allocation 49 29 $980.37 947 29 $980.37 965 29 $980.37 967 29 $980.37 1066 29 $980.37 36 31 $1,047.98 39 31 $1,047.98 982 31 $1,047.98 1000 32 $1,081.79 73 33 $1,115.59 925 33 $1,115.59 46 34 $1,149.40 1081 34 $1,149.40 22 35 $1,183.20 23 35 $1,183.20 888 35 $1,183.20 977 35 $1,183.20 1005 35 $1,183.20 65 36 $1,217.01 68 36 $1,217.01 878 36 $1,217.01 1024 36 $1,217.01 58 37 $1,250.82 945 37 $1,250.82 1053 37 $1,250.82 32 38 $1,284.62 895 39 $1,318.43 916 39 $1,318.43 933 39 $1,318.43 1014 39 $1,318.43 1079 39 $1,318.43 2 40 $1,352.23 57 40 $1,352.23 937 40 $1,352.23 971 40 $1,352.23 1051 40 $1,352.23 48 41 $1,386.04 1023 41 $1,386.04 56 42 $1,419.85 37 44 $1,487.46 30 45 $1,521.26 45 45 $1,521.26 994 45 $1,521.26 1055 47 $1,588.88 63 48 $1,622.68 1011 48 $1,622.68 1031 48 $1,622.68 1052 48 $1,622.68 61 49 $1,656.49 936 49 $1,656.49 51 $1,724.10 55 897 52 $1,757.90 999 52 $1,757.90 13 53 $1,791.71 Client ID Weeks Allocation 996 53 $1,791.71 938 54 $1,825.52 47 55 $1,859.32 885 55 $1,859.32 991 55 $1,859.32 1056 55 $1,859.32 24 57 $1,926.93 1002 57 $1,926.93 1071 57 $1,926.93 59 58 $1,960.74 915 58 $1,960.74 1082 59 $1,994.55 3 60 $2,028.35 1047 62 $2,095.96 941 68 $2,298.80 943 68 $2,298.80 17 70 $2,366.41 51 70 $2,366.41 872 70 $2,366.41 974 72 $2,434.02 11 74 $2,501.63 1073 76 $2,569.24 35 79 $2,670.66 1078 83 $2,805.89 29 84 $2,839.69 1087 91 $3,076.33 27 94 $3,177.75 1020 96 $3,245.36 25 102 $3,448.20 67 103 $3,482.00 1083 103 $3,482.00 71 111 $3,752.45 1090 133 $4,496.18 978 145 $4,901.85 988 151 $5,104.68 $258,750.11
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
