Oncology Therapeutics Network Corporation v. Virginia Hematology Oncology PLLC et al, No. 4:2005cv03033 - Document 8 (N.D. Cal. 2005)
Court Description: ORDER REQUESTING DECISION REGARDING CONSENT OR REASSIGNMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazil on 8/4/05. (Attachments: # 1)(wdblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2005) Modified on 8/5/2005 (cjl, COURT STAFF).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Oncology Therapeutics Network Corporation v. Virginia Hematology Oncology PLLC et al Case 4:05-cv-03033-WDB Document 8 Filed 08/04/2005 Doc. 8 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 Oncology Therapeutics Network Connection, Plaintiff, 9 ORDER REQUESTING DECISION REGARDING CONSENT OR REASSIGNMENT v. 11 13 Virginia Hematology Oncology PLLC, a limited liability company; Ronald Poulin, an individual, 14 Defendant(s). _____________________________/ 12 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 No. C 05-3033 WDB 15 This case was randomly assigned at filing to the undersigned United States Magistrate 16 Judge. Without the written consent of all parties to jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 17 636(c), a Magistrate Judge may not hear and determine a motion that could be dispositive of 18 an action or a claim or defense. On August 2, 2005, defendant Ronald F. Poulin filed a 19 motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Federal Rule of 20 Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted 21 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) - a potentially dispositive motion. In 22 light of defendant's pending motion, the Court asks the parties to consider the attached 23 "Consent to Assignment or Request for Reassignment," make an election, and e-file the 24 consent or request for reassignment by no later than August 15, 2005. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 4, 2005 WAYNE D. BRAZIL United States Magistrate Judge 27 28 Copies to: Parties, WDB. 1 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
