The People of the State of California et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 3:2010cv05212 - Document 19 (N.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION re 18 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2011) Modified on 1/28/2011 (ys, COURT STAFF).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
The People of the State of California et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Doc. 19 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP JOHN M. GRENFELL (CA State Bar No. 88500) john.grenfell@pillsburylaw.com JACOB R. SORENSEN (CA State Bar No. 209134) jake.sorensen@pillsburylaw.com FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice) fusae.nara@pillsburylaw.com ANDREW D. LANPHERE (CA State Bar No. 191479) andrew.lanphere@pillsburylaw.com 50 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 983-1000 Facsimile: (415) 983-1200 Attorneys for Defendants SHARP CORPORATION and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION [Additional defendants and counsel listed on signature page] 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI MDL No. 1827 This Document Relates To: No. CV-10-5212 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO MOVE AGAINST, ANSWER, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 17 18 19 20 21 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General of the State of California, as parens patriae on behalf of natural persons residing in the state, et al., 22 Plaintiffs, 23 24 25 v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 26 27 28 500696709v1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827 Dockets.Justia.com 1 WHEREAS the State of California, et al. (“the State”) filed the above-captioned 2 action on October 15, 2010 in the Superior Court for the City and County of San Francisco; 3 WHEREAS on November 12, 2010, certain parties reached, and the Superior Court 4 approved, a stipulation extending the date to respond to the Complaint to February 1, 2011 5 (Dkt. No. 1-1, Ex. D); 6 WHEREAS defendants removed this action to this Court on November 17, 2010; 7 WHEREAS the State filed a Motion to Remand this action back to the Superior 8 Court on December 17, 2010 (Dkt. No. 10), which is due to be heard on February 9, 2011 9 (Dkt. No 14); 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 WHEREAS pursuant to the removal and this Court’s pre-trial orders, the State is currently a party to MDL 1827; WHEREAS the State has not otherwise consented to, nor availed itself of, the jurisdiction of this Court; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the undersigned counsel, as follows: 1. The time for the undersigned defendants to move against, answer, or 17 otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended until thirty (30) days after an order is 18 entered by this Court either granting or denying the State’s Motion to Remand; 19 2. In the event that the State files a First Amended Complaint, in the Superior 20 Court or this Court, prior to the time for defendants to move against, answer, or otherwise 21 respond to the Complaint as described in paragraph 1, defendants will have thirty (30) days 22 after the State files a First Amended Complaint to move against, answer, or otherwise 23 respond. 24 3. The State will provide defendants with reasonable notice of its intent to 25 amend the Complaint, which notice will be provided no later than fourteen (14) days after 26 an order is entered by this Court either granting or denying the State’s Motion to Remand. 27 If such notice is given, defendants’ deadline to respond under Paragraph 1 shall be 28 suspended and Paragraph 2 shall apply. 500696709v1 -1- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827 1 2 3 4. Defendants shall not object to the State filing a First Amended Complaint upon providing notice as described in Paragraph 3. 5. The parties agree that this stipulation shall not constitute consent to this 4 Court’s jurisdiction, and does not waive any of the State’s rights to remand the Complaint 5 to the Superior Court. 6 7 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 8 9 Dated: January 27, 2011. 10 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 By: /s/ Adam Miller Adam Miller 14 ADAM MILLER (State Bar No. 168254) Deputy Attorney General adam.miller@doj.ca.gov 455 Golden Gate Ave., Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102 Tel: (415) 703-5551 Fax: (415) 703-5480 15 16 17 18 19 Attorneys for Plaintiffs STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 500696709v1 -2- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827 1 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 2 By: /s/ John M. Grenfell John M. Grenfell 3 JOHN M. GRENFELL (State Bar No. 88500) JACOB R. SORENSEN (State Bar No. 209134) FUSAE NARA (pro hac vice) ANDREW D. LANPHERE (State Bar No. 191479) john.grenfell@pillsburylaw.com 50 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel: (415) 983-1000 Fax: (415) 983-1200 4 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants SHARP CORPORATION and SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 9 10 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 11 12 By: /s/ Nathan L. Walker Nathan L. Walker 13 NATHAN L. WALKER (State Bar No. 206128) Nathan.Walker@wilmerhale.com 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Tel: (650) 858-6000 Fax: (650) 858-6100 14 15 16 17 STEVEN F. CHERRY Steven.Cherry@wilmerhale.com 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Phone: (202) 663-6000 Fax: (202) 663-6363 18 19 20 Attorneys for Defendants CHIMEI INNOLUX CORP., CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORP. USA, INC., and CMO JAPAN CO., LTD. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 500696709v1 -3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827 1 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 2 By: /s/ Stephen P. Freccero Stephen P. Freccero 3 MELVIN R. GOLDMAN (State Bar No. 34097) STEPHEN P. FRECCERO (State Bar No. 131093) DEREK F. FORAN (State Bar No. 224569) MGoldman@mofo.com SFreccero@mofo.com DForan@mofo.com 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 (415) 268-7000 (Phone) (415) 268-7522 (Facsimile) Attorneys for Defendants EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION and EPSON ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 12 By: /s/ Kent M. Roger Kent M. Roger 13 KENT M. ROGER (State Bar No. 95987) MICHELLE KIM-SZROM (State Bar No. 252901) kroger@morganlewis.com mkim-szrom@morganlewis.com One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 (415) 442-1000 (Phone) (415) 442-1001 (Facsimile) 14 15 16 17 18 Attorneys for Defendants HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD. and HITACHI ELECTRONIC DEVICES (USA), INC. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 500696709v1 -4- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827 1 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 2 By: /s/ Simon J. Frankel Simon J. Frankel 3 SIMON J. FRANKEL (CA Bar No. 171552) JEFFREY M. DAVIDSON (CA Bar No. 248620) sfrankel@cov.com jdavidson@cov.com 1 Front Street, 35th Floor San Francisco CA 94109 (415) 591-7021 (Phone) (415) 955-6521 (Facsimile) Attorneys for Defendants SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 WHITE & CASE LLP 12 By: /s/ Christopher M. Curran Christopher M. Curran 13 BIJAL V. VAKIL (State Bar No. 192878) bvakil@whitecase.com 3000 El Camino Real 5 Palo Alto Square, 9th Floor Palo Alto, CA 94306 (650) 213-0300 (Phone) (650) 213-8158 (Facsimile) 14 15 16 17 CHRISTOPHER M. CURRAN JOHN H. CHUNG KRISTEN J. MCAHREN ccurran@whitecase.com jchung@whitecase.com kmcahren@whitecase.com 1155 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 (212) 819-8200 (Phone) (212) 354-8113 (Facsimile) 18 19 20 21 22 23 Attorneys for Defendants TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY CO., LTD.; TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC.; and TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. 24 25 26 Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other 27 signatories thereto has been obtained. 28 500696709v1 -5- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827 1 IT IS SO ORDERED: 2 __________________________ 3 Hon. Susan Illston 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 500696709v1 -6- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
