Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 3:2010cv04945 - Document 12 (N.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION re 11 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2011) Modified on 1/28/2011 (ys, COURT STAFF).
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Target Corp. et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al 1 2 3 4 5 Doc. 12 Steven F. Cherry (pro hac vice) Adam M. Raviv (pro hac vice) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006-3642 Telephone: (202) 663-6000 Facsimile: (202) 663-6363 Steven.Cherry@wilmerhale.com 7 Defense Co-Liaison Counsel and Attorneys for Chi Mei Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation), Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech Inc., and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc. 8 [Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page] 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 12 13 IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI MDL No. 1827 14 15 This Document Relates to Individual Case No. 3:10-cv-04945-SI 16 TARGET CORP., et al., 17 18 19 20 Plaintiffs, v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING AU Optronics Corporation, et al., Defendants. 21 22 WHEREAS the undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, plaintiffs 23 Target Corp., Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Corp., Old Comp Inc., Good Guys, Inc., RadioShack 24 Corp., and Newegg Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint in the above-captioned case 25 against AU Optronics Corporation; AU Optronics Corporation America; Chi Mei Corporation; 26 Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation); Chi Mei Optoelectronics 27 USA, Inc.; CMO Japan Co., Ltd.; Nexgen Mediatech Inc.; Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc.; Epson 28 -1CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING Dockets.Justia.com 1 Imaging Devices Corporation; Epson Electronics America, Inc.; LG Display Co., Ltd.; LG Display 2 America, Inc.; Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.; Samsung Electronics 3 America, Inc.; Sharp Corporation; Sharp Electronics Corporation; Toshiba Corporation; Toshiba 4 America Electronic Components, Inc.; Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd.; and Toshiba America 5 Information Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Stipulating Defendants”), on November 1, 2010 6 (“Complaint”); 7 8 WHEREAS Plaintiffs wish to avoid the burden and expense of serving process on the Stipulating Defendants; 9 10 WHEREAS the Stipulating Defendants desire a reasonable amount of time to respond to the Complaint; 11 WHEREAS Plaintiffs and the Stipulating Defendants believe that proceeding on a 12 unified response date will create efficiency for the Court and the parties by reducing duplicative 13 motion practice; 14 15 THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and the Stipulating Defendants hereby agree: 1. The Stipulating Defendants waive service of the Complaint under Federal Rule of 16 Civil Procedure 4(d). This stipulation does not constitute a waiver by the Stipulating Defendants of 17 any other substantive or procedural defense, including but not limited to the defense of lack of 18 personal or subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue. 19 2. The Stipulating Defendants’ deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise 20 respond to the Complaint will be 90 days from the execution of this stipulation. 21 DATED: January 27, 2011 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CROWELL & MORNING LLP By: /s/ Jason C. Murray Jason C. Murray Jason C. Murray (CA SBN 169806) 515 South Flower Street, 40th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: (213) 422-5582 Fax: (213) 622-2690 jmurray@crowell.com -2CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Jeffrey H. Howard (pro hac vice) Jerome A. Murphy (pro hac vice) 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Tel: (202) 624-2500 Fax: (202) 628-5116 jhoward@crowell.com jmurphy@crowell.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Target Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart Corporation, Old Comp Inc., Good Guys, Inc., RadioShack Corporation, and Newegg Inc. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP By: /s/ Steven F. Cherry Steven F. Cherry Steven F. Cherry (pro hac vice) Adam M. Raviv (pro hac vice) 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006 Tel: (202) 663-6000 Fax: (202) 663-6363 steven.cherry@wilmerhale.com adam.raviv@wilmerhale.com Defense Co-Liaison Counsel and Attorneys for Chi Mei Corporation, Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation), Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech Inc., and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc. NOSSAMAN LLP 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: /s/ Christopher A. Nedeau Christopher A. Nedeau Christopher A. Nedeau (CA SBN 81297) Carl L. Blumenstein (CA SBN 124158) Allison M. Dibley (CA SBN 213104) 50 California Street, 34th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 398-3600 Fax: (415) 398-2438 cnedeau@nossaman.com cblumenstein@nossaman. com -3CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING 1 2 3 4 adibley@nossaman.com Defense Co-Liaison Counsel and Attorneys for Defendants AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 By: /s/ Jeremy J. Calsyn Jeremy J. Calsyn Michael R. Lazerwitz (pro hac vice) Jeremy J. Calsyn (CA SBN 205062) Lee F. Berger (CA SBN 222756) 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20006 Tel.: (202) 974-1500 Fax: (202) 974-1999 mlazerwitz@cgsh.com jcalsyn@cgsh.com lberger@cgsh.com Attorneys for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc. PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 By: /s/ John M. Grenfell John M. Grenfell John M. Grenfell (CA SBN 88500) Jacob R. Sorensen (CA SBN 209134) Fusae Nara (pro hac vice) Andrew D. Lanphere (CA SBN 191479) 50 Fremont Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel.: (415) 983-1000 Fax: (415) 983-1200 john.grenfell@pillsburylaw.com jake.sorensen@pillsburylaw.com fusae.nara@pillsburylaw.com andrew.lanphere@pillsburylaw.com Attorneys for Defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation 27 28 -4CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING 1 2 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Stephen P. Freccero Stephen P. Freccero 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Melvin R. Goldman (CA SBN 34097) Stephen P. Freccero (CA SBN 131093) Derek F. Foran (CA SBN 224569) 425 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Tel.: (415) 268-7000 Fax: (415) 268-7522 mgoldman@mofo.com sfreccero@mofo.com dforan@mofo.com Attorneys for Defendants Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson Electronics America, Inc. 11 12 COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 13 By: /s/ Simon J. Frankel Simon J. Frankel 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Simon J. Frankel (CA SBN 171552) Jeffrey M. Davidson (CA SBN 248620) One Front Street, 35th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel.: (415) 591-6000 Fax: (415) 591-6091 sfrankel@cov.com jdavidson@cov.com Attorneys for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 22 23 24 WHITE & CASE LLP By: /s/ John H. Chung John H. Chung 25 26 27 28 John H. Chung (pro hac vice) 1155 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036 Tel: (212) 819-8200 Fax: (212) 354-8113 -5CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING 1 2 3 4 5 jchung@whitecase.com Christopher M. Curran (pro hac vice) Kristen J. McAhren (pro hac vice) 701 Thirteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 Tel: (202) 626-3600 Fax: (202) 639-9355 ccurran@whitecase.com kmcahren@whitecase.com 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd., and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. 9 10 11 Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Jason C. Murray, Christopher A. Nedeau, Jeremy J. Calsyn, John M. Grenfell, Stephen P. Freccero, Simon J. Frankel, and John H. Chung. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -6CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 6 Dated: The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -7CASE NO. 3:07-md-1827 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SERVICE AND SCHEDULING
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
