Innospan Corp v. Intuit et al, No. 3:2010cv04422 - Document 160 (N.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING re 152 Letter filed by Mint Software Inc, Intuit's Request for Discovery Relief. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 6/10/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2011)
Download PDF
Innospan Corp v. Intuit et al Doc. 160 Case3:10-cv-04422-WHA Document159 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 RODGER R. COLE (CSB NO. 178865) rcole@fenwick.com SONGMEE L. CONNOLLY (CSB NO. 228555) sconnolly@fenwick.com JOSEPH S. BELICHICK (CSB NO. 229371) jbelichick@fenwick.com SEAN S. WIKNER (CSB NO. 268319) swikner@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: (650) 988-8500 Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 Attorneys for Defendants and Counter-Claimants INTUIT INC. and MINT SOFTWARE INC. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA L AW V IEW IN M OUNTA A TTORNEYS AT F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 Filed06/09/11 Page1 of 11 INNOSPAN CORP., Plaintiff, v. INTUIT; MINT SOFTWARE INC.; SHASTA VENTURES GP, LLC, Case No. C10-04422 WHA (JCS) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTUIT INC. AND MINT SOFTWARE INC.’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 INTUIT INC. and MINT SOFTWARE INC., Counter-Claimants, 24 25 v. 26 INNOSPAN CORP. and HONG-SEOK KIM, 27 Counter-Defendants. 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTUIT’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF CASE NO. C10-04422 WHA (JCS) Dockets.Justia.com Case3:10-cv-04422-WHA Document159 1 Filed06/09/11 Page2 of 11 ORDER 2 Before the Court is Intuit’s [Proposed] Joint Submission containing Defendants Intuit Inc. 3 and Mint Software Inc.’s (collectively, “Intuit’s”) request for discovery relief, filed on June 2, 4 2011. 5 6 7 Having considered the [Proposed] Joint Submission, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Intuit’s request for discovery relief is GRANTED as follows: Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Innospan Corp. (“Plaintiff” or “Innospan”) and Counter- 8 Defendant Hong-Seok Kim (“Kim”) shall allow Intuit to conduct forensic searches of their 9 electronic media and web-based accounts in compliance with the following protocols set forth in L AW R NIA ______________________________________ THE HONORABLE JOSEPH S. SPERO ER C United States Magistrate Judge N OF A 15 pero S seph C. LI June 10 Dated: ___________________, 2011 Judge Jo H M OUNTAIN V IEW 14 RT A TTORNEYS AT 13 NO F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 FO S IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 11 Exhibit A hereto. UNIT ED 10 D IS T IC T R 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTUIT’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF 1 CASE NO. C10-04422 WHA (JCS) Case3:10-cv-04422-WHA Document159 1 Filed06/09/11 Page3 of 11 Exhibit A: Protocols for Forensic Search 2 The third-party vendor selected to perform the work described in this Order Granting 3 Intuit’s Request for Discovery Relief (“Order”) may not disclose the contents of any of the copied 4 media described herein except as authorized by this Order (or otherwise authorized by the Court) 5 or unless otherwise consented to by Plaintiff. Moreover, the third-party vendor may only conduct 6 searches and examinations of the media described herein as authorized by this Order (or 7 otherwise authorized by the Court) or unless otherwise consented to by Plaintiff. 8 Computer Media Protocol: 9 1. No later than June 10, 2011, Plaintiff and Kim shall identify all computers, hard 10 drives, i-Nail machines, or other devices capable of storing electronic information to counsel for 11 Intuit. L AW M OUNTAIN V IEW A TTORNEYS AT F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 2. No later than June 13, 2011, an agreed upon qualified outside vendor will access 13 all of Plaintiff’s and Kim’s computer media (including without limitation all servers, computers, 14 hard drives, or other electronic media) in the possession, custody or control of Plaintiff or Kim to 15 make forensic copies of the media. 16 3. Search terms, attached hereto as Exhibit B to the Order Granting Intuit’s Request 17 for Discovery Relief, tailored to capture the documents sought by the Requests for Production 18 (the “Responsiveness Filter”), will then be run against the data stored on the media. 19 4. A second set of search terms designed to capture any privileged documents (the 20 “Privilege Screen”) will then be run against the data set obtained by running the Responsiveness 21 Filter. The Privilege Screen search terms are attached hereto as Exhibit C. 22 23 24 5. The results of the Privilege Screen will then be provided to Kim and Plaintiff’s attorney for a subsequent privilege review. 6. Any documents contained in the data set obtained by running the Responsiveness 25 Filter that are not captured by the Privilege Screen will be bates numbered and concurrently 26 produced to all parties of record for review. 27 28 7. Within a reasonable period of time, no longer than 14 days, Plaintiff’s counsel will produce any non-privileged documents captured by the Privilege Screen to all parties of record [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTUIT’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF 2 CASE NO. C10-04422 WHA (JCS) Case3:10-cv-04422-WHA Document159 Filed06/09/11 Page4 of 11 1 and will provide a privilege log identifying all allegedly privileged documents withheld from 2 production. 3 8. The technical expert examining the imaged computer media will then provide a 4 report identifying any abnormalities found and discussing whether any data has been lost or 5 destroyed. 6 Internet Media Protocol: 7 1. No later than June 10, 2011, Plaintiff and Kim shall identify all Internet-based 8 accounts storing electronic information of Plaintiff or any company owned or controlled in whole 9 or in part by Kim to counsel for Intuit, including identification of all Internet-based accounts 10 storing electronic information used by Plaintiff or any company owned or controlled in whole or 11 in part by Kim between 2005 to the present. L AW M OUNTAIN V IEW A TTORNEYS AT F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 2. No later than June 13, 2011, an agreed upon qualified outside vendor will be 13 provided with login and password information for all Internet-based accounts storing electronic 14 information of Plaintiff or any company owned or controlled in whole or in part by Kim, 15 including but not limited to the following Internet-based accounts: 16 (a) All email accounts used by H.S. Kim, including but not limited to 17 Hydro_kim@yahoo.com, HKim@mintcom.net, Hkim@mvigo.com, admin@mintcom.net, and 18 kimhs@posdata.co.kr. 19 20 (b) inailparty.com, i-nail.net or any other webhosting account affiliated with Plaintiff. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 All Yahoo! based webhosting accounts for www.mintcom.net, (c) 3. Any webhosting account used by www.gleeu.net. The Responsiveness Filter will then be run against all data stored in Plaintiff’s Internet-based accounts. 4. The Privilege Screen will then be run against the data set obtained by running the Responsiveness Filter. 5. The results of the Privilege Screen will then be provided to Plaintiff’s attorney for a subsequent privilege review. 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTUIT’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF 3 CASE NO. C10-04422 WHA (JCS) Case3:10-cv-04422-WHA Document159 1 6. Filed06/09/11 Page5 of 11 Any documents contained in the data set obtained by running the Responsiveness 2 Filter that are not captured by the Privilege Screen will be bates numbered and concurrently 3 produced to all parties of record for review. 4 7. Within a reasonable period of time, no longer than 14 days, Plaintiff’s counsel will 5 produce any non-privileged documents captured by the Privilege Screen to all parties of record 6 and will provide a privilege log identifying all allegedly privileged documents withheld from 7 production. 8 9 10 11 8. The technical expert examining the Internet-based accounts and will then provide a report identifying any abnormalities found and discussing whether any data has been lost or destroyed. 9. If any abnormalities are found or if any data is found to have been deleted, L AW M OUNTAIN V IEW A TTORNEYS AT F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 Plaintiff and Kim shall provide all necessary assistance in the recovery of any such data, 13 including by way of providing any consent necessary to allow the applicable service provider to 14 restore or recover any lost data. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTUIT’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF 4 CASE NO. C10-04422 WHA (JCS) Case3:10-cv-04422-WHA Document159 1 Filed06/09/11 Page6 of 11 Exhibit B 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 L AW M OUNTAIN V IEW A TTORNEYS AT F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 *coneybeer* Tod* /2 francis *Pressman* *putorti* *yi* *corecess* *Mint* *guo* *maydesign* trademark* Trade /2 mark* design* Innospan* Infring* Registration* Logo* Service /2 mark* servicemark* trade /2 name* Tradename* *Shasta* *Gleeu* “i-nail” *inail* IT /2 Consulting confus* mobile /2 printer vdsl-2 wimax g.hn gpon IPTV home /2 network* Mobile /2 app* Rivermark /2 dental Cutey /3 nails *Mvigo* *jenosis* *corecom* *acrowave* [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTUIT’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF 5 CASE NO. C10-04422 WHA (JCS) Case3:10-cv-04422-WHA Document159 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Filed06/09/11 Page7 of 11 *tellion* Memorandum /3 understand! Asset /3 purchase Foundation /3 capital *foundationcap* *grosser* *STIC* *Firooz* *massoudi* P.T.O PTO Trademark /2 office Copyright /2 office Assign* 11 L AW M OUNTAIN V IEW A TTORNEYS AT F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTUIT’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF 6 CASE NO. C10-04422 WHA (JCS) Case3:10-cv-04422-WHA Document159 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 L AW M OUNTAIN V IEW A TTORNEYS AT F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Filed06/09/11 Page8 of 11 Exhibit C Marquis Marquis IP Brookstone Law Brookstone deposition copyright trademark trade secrets proprietary attorney client litigation suit confidential privilege(d) attorney/client strategy opinion plan fee agreement retain retainer legal advice legal service legal question damages punitive damages treble damages insurance complaint counterclaim counterclaims affirmative defenses liability liable liabilities waive waiver responsible temporary restraining order fault TRO preliminary injunction [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTUIT’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF 7 CASE NO. C10-04422 WHA (JCS) Case3:10-cv-04422-WHA Document159 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 L AW M OUNTAIN V IEW A TTORNEYS AT F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Filed06/09/11 Page9 of 11 injunction expert witness third party witness 3rd party interview evidence witness discovery interrogatories requests to produce product request for admissions investigation internal publicity press release fees legal fees compensation incentive recovery misappropriation conversion lawyer settlement settle morgan lewis reiland lawyer litigation john park sujung sujung park park sujung.park spark kristine sue sue lee associate tax declaration agreement job [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTUIT’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF 8 CASE NO. C10-04422 WHA (JCS) Case3:10-cv-04422-WHA Document159 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 L AW M OUNTAIN V IEW A TTORNEYS AT F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Filed06/09/11 Page10 of 11 lawsuit brian song brian song briansong lawyersong william levin williamlevin bill William E. Levin fenwick cooley fee separation lawyer legal law lawful unlawful sanction lawsuit suit trial evidence john john park Morgan lewis wife spouse order judgment agreement position credibility motion law office represent landlord tenant claim malicious insurance tax return [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTUIT’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF 9 CASE NO. C10-04422 WHA (JCS) Case3:10-cv-04422-WHA Document159 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 L AW M OUNTAIN V IEW A TTORNEYS AT F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 Filed06/09/11 Page11 of 11 property tax damage damages action tax appeal carlquistlaw klgates pillsburylaw kilpatricktownsend idellseitel dlapiper yasinlaw WHA e-discovery forensic IRS CPA cpa Disclosure 13 14 (*The use of the singular form of any word includes the plural, and the use of the plural form 15 includes the singular form. And also, the use of the capital letter of any word includes the lower 16 case, and the use of the lower case should include the capital letter.) 17 16319/40065/SF/5342420.5 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING INTUIT’S REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF 10 CASE NO. C10-04422 WHA (JCS)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.