State of Missouri et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al, No. 3:2010cv03619 - Document 166 (N.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT RE INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF/STATE ENTITY CLASS ACTIONS. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 4/1/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2013)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
State of Missouri et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al Doc. 166 1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 / 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 This Order Relates to: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 MDL. No. 1827 FINAL JUDGMENT RE INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFF/STATE ENTITY CLASS ACTIONS ALL INDIRECT-PURCHASER PLAINTIFF CLASS ACTIONS 11 12 No. M 07-1827 SI IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL) ANTITRUST LITIGATION / In prior Orders, this Court has finally approved the combined class, parens patriae, and governmental entity settlements between the Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs (“IPPs”) and the States of Arkansas, California, Florida, Michigan, Missouri, New York, West Virginia, and Wisconsin (“Settling States”) on the one hand, and the Chimei, Chunghwa, Epson, HannStar, Hitachi, Samsung, Sharp, AUO, LG, and Toshiba Defendants, on the other. The Court has also awarded attorneys fees, reimbursement of expenses and incentive awards. Judgment of dismissal with prejudice as to these parties is entered accordingly. 20 21 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED. Dated: April 1, 2013 _________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
