Gray v. Salao et al, No. 3:2010cv03474 - Document 20 (N.D. Cal. 2011)
Court Description: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Alsup denying 17 Motion to Stay (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2011)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KENNETH WAYNE GRAY, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING DECISION ON MOTION TO DISMISS R. SALAO, et al., Defendants. / 15 16 No. C 10-03474 WHA Defendants move to stay discovery pending a decision on their motion to dismiss, which 17 is set for a hearing on June 16. Defendants seek this stay because it would be unduly 18 burdensome for Defendants to respond to discovery before the Court resolves their motion to 19 dismiss . . . [and] [a]ll parties will save significant time and money if they can avoid conducting 20 ultimately unnecessary discovery. This rationale would allow for a stay of discovery in any case 21 when any motion is pending. A decision on defendants motion to dismiss will be rendered 22 promptly when it becomes ripe. Good cause not shown, defendants motion for a stay of 23 discovery is DENIED. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: May 17, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
