District Counsel 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. McCormick Floor Covering, Inc., No. 3:2010cv03282 - Document 9 (N.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER granting re 7 Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation, filed by Resilient Floor Covering Pension Fund, its Board of Trustees, Steve Sullivan, District Counsel 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees, Dis trict Council 16 Northern California Apprentice & Journeyman Training Trust Fund, Carl Biggs, Doug Christopher, District Council 16 of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, Vince Echeverria, Central Coast Counties Floor Covering Industry Pension Fund, its Board of Trustees. Signed by Judge James Larson on 12/2/10. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/2/2010)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
District Counsel 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust...v. McCormick Floor Covering, Inc. Doc. 9 1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) Blake E. Williams, Esq. (SBN 233158) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 882-7900 4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile mstafford@sjlawcorp.com 5 bwilliams@sjlawcorp.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DISTRICT COUNCIL 16 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST 11 FUND, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 Case No: CV10-3282 - JL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION v. 14 McCORMICK FLOOR COVERING, INC., a California Corporation 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, that Judgment may be 19 entered in the within action in favor of the Plaintiffs DISTRICT COUNCIL 16 NORTHERN 20 CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND, et al. (collectively “Plaintiffs” or 21 “Trust Funds”) and against Defendant McCORMICK FLOOR COVERING, INC. (“Defendant”), 22 as follows: 23 1. Defendant entered into a valid Collective Bargaining Agreement with the 24 District Council 16 of the Northern California Floor Covering Association and Floor Covering 25 Association of the Central Coast Counties (hereinafter "Bargaining Agreement"). This Bargaining 26 Agreement has continued in full force and effect to the present time. 27 28 P:\CLIENTS\FLRCL\McCormick Floor Covering\McCormick Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation 091010.doc -1JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION Case No.: C10-3282 JL Dockets.Justia.com 1 2. MICHAEL VINCENT MCCORMICK, individually and as RMO/CEO/President 2 of McCORMICK FLOOR COVERING, INC., hereby acknowledges that he is authorized to 3 receive service and has received the following documents in this action: Summons; Complaint; 4 Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California; Order Setting Initial Case 5 Management Conference and ADR Deadlines; Standing Orders; Instructions for Completion of 6 ADR Forms Regarding Selection of an ADR Process; Stipulation and [Proposed Order] Selecting 7 ADR Process; Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference; ADR Certification by Parties and 8 Counsel; Notice of Assignment of Case to a United States Magistrate Judge for Trial; Consenting 9 to a Magistrate Judge’s Jurisdiction in the Northern District of California; ECF Registration 10 Information Handout; Welcome to the U.S. District Court, San Francisco; Certification of 11 Interested Entities or Persons Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-16; and Consent to Proceed Before 12 United States Magistrate Judge James Larson. 13 3. Defendant has become indebted to the Trust Funds as follows: Audit 14 15 16 17 Contribution Underpayments Liquidated Damages 5% Interest (through 9/10/10) Audit Testing Fee Improper Payments Credit 10% Administrative Fee SUBTOTAL Attorneys’ Fees (through 9/10/10) Cost of Suit TOTAL DUE 18 19 $38,846.08 $750.00 $5,392.21 $2,370.50 ($5,438.11) $543.81 $42,464.49 $2,182.50 $350.00 $44,996.99 20 21 4. Defendant shall pay the amount of $44,996.99, representing all above amounts, as 22 follows: 23 (a) On or before October 1, 2010, and no later than the 1st day of each month 24 thereafter for a period of six (6) months, through and including March 1, 2011, Defendant shall 25 pay to Plaintiffs the amount of $500.00; 26 27 28 -2JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION Case No.: C10-3282 JL P:\CLIENTS\FLRCL\McCormick Floor Covering\McCormick Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation 091010.doc (b) 1 On or before April 1, 2011, and no later than the 1st day of each month 2 thereafter for a period of six (6) months, through and including September 1, 2011, Defendant 3 shall pay to Plaintiffs the amount of $1,000.00; (c) 4 On or before October 1, 2011, and no later than the 1st day of each month 5 thereafter for a period of twelve (12) months, through and including September 1, 2012, 6 Defendant shall pay to Plaintiffs the amount of $3,265.00; (d) 7 Defendant shall have the right to increase the monthly payments at any time 8 and there is no penalty for early payment. Defendant may request a “payout demand” at any time 9 during the payment period; (e) 10 Payments shall be applied first to unpaid interest and then to unpaid 11 principal. The unpaid principal balance shall bear interest at the rate of 5% per annum in 12 accordance with Plaintiffs’ Trust Agreements; (f) 13 Payments shall be made payable to the “District Council 16 Health and 14 Welfare Trust Fund,” and delivered to Blake E. Williams at Saltzman & Johnson Law 15 Corporation, 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110, San Francisco, California 94104, or to such other 16 address as may be specified by Plaintiffs, to be received on or before the 1st day of each month; (g) 17 Prior to the last payment pursuant to this Stipulation, Plaintiffs will advise 18 Defendant as to the final amount due, including interest and additional attorneys’ fees and costs as 19 well as any other amounts due under the terms herein. Said amount shall be paid with the last 20 payment, on or before September 1, 2012. 21 5. MICHAEL VINCENT MCCORMICK acknowledges that he is the 22 RMO/CEO/President of MCCORMICK FLOOR COVERING, INC., and that he specifically 23 consents to the Court’s jurisdiction, as well as the use of a Magistrate Judge for all proceedings 24 herein. Mr. McCormick (hereinafter “Guarantor”) also confirms that he is personally guaranteeing 25 the amounts due pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation and further acknowledges that all 26 affiliates, related entities and successors in interest to MCCORMICK FLOOR COVERING, INC., 27 and/or any subsequent entity wherein Mr. McCormick is a principal shall also be bound by the 28 -3JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION Case No.: C10-3282 JL P:\CLIENTS\FLRCL\McCormick Floor Covering\McCormick Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation 091010.doc 1 terms of this Stipulation as Guarantors, and also consent to this Court’s jurisdiction as well as the 2 use of a Magistrate Judge. 3 6. Plaintiffs reserve all rights available under the applicable Bargaining Agreement 4 and Declarations of Trust of the Trust Funds for collection of current and future contributions, and 5 for any additional past contributions not included herein as may be determined by Plaintiffs, 6 pursuant to employee timecards or paystubs, by audit, or other means, and the provisions of this 7 agreement are in addition thereto. Defendant/Guarantor specifically waives the defense of the 8 doctrine res judicata as to any such additional amounts determined as due. 9 7. In the event that Defendant fails to make any payment referenced herein in a timely 10 manner as required, or if payment is made and fails to clear the bank, or is unable to be negotiated 11 for any reason, Defendant shall be considered to be in default of this Stipulation. 12 8. In the event of a default, Plaintiffs will provide Defendant/Guarantor with written 13 notice of the default, allowing seven (7) days from the date of the notice in which to cure the 14 default. All future payments shall be made by cashier’s check if the default was caused by a failed 15 check. In the event that a default is not timely cured, the following will occur: 16 (a) The entire balance of $44,996.99 as specified in paragraph 3, plus interest 17 as specified above, but reduced by principal payments received from Defendant, in addition to any 18 unpaid contributions then due plus 20% liquidated damages and 5% per annum interest thereon, 19 shall be immediately due and payable, together with any additional attorneys’ fees and costs 20 incurred in this matter; 21 (b) A writ of execution may be obtained against Defendant without notice in 22 the amount of the unpaid balance, plus any additional amounts under the terms herein, upon 23 declaration by a duly authorized representative of the Plaintiffs setting forth any payment 24 theretofore made by or on behalf of Defendant/Guarantor and the balance due and owing as of the 25 date of default. Defendant specifically consents to the authority of a Magistrate Judge for all 26 proceedings, including, but not limited to, Plaintiffs’ obtaining a writ of execution herein; 27 28 -4JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION Case No.: C10-3282 JL P:\CLIENTS\FLRCL\McCormick Floor Covering\McCormick Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation 091010.doc (c) 1 Defendant expressly waives all rights to stay of execution and appeal. The 2 declaration or affidavit of a duly authorized representative of Plaintiffs as to the balance due and 3 owing as of the date of default shall be sufficient to secure the issuance of a Writ of Execution, 4 without notice to Defendant; (d) 5 Defendant shall pay all additional costs and attorneys’ fees incurred by 6 Plaintiffs in connection with collection and allocation of the amounts owed to Plaintiffs under this 7 Stipulation regardless of whether or not Defendant/Guarantor defaults herein. 8 9. In the event of the filing of a bankruptcy petition by the Defendant, the parties 9 agree that any payments made pursuant to the terms of this Judgment, shall be deemed to have 10 been made in the ordinary course of business as provided under 11 U.S.C. Section 547(c)(2) and 11 shall not be claimed by Defendant as a preference under 11 U.S.C. Section 547 or otherwise. 12 Defendant nevertheless represents that no bankruptcy filing is anticipated. 13 10. Any failure on the part of the Plaintiffs to take any action against Defendant as 14 provided herein in the event of any breach of the provisions of this Stipulation shall not be deemed 15 a waiver of any subsequent breach by the Defendant/Guarantor of any provisions herein. 16 11. Should any provision of this Stipulation be declared or determined by any court of 17 competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the legality, validity, and 18 enforceability of the remaining parts, terms or provisions shall not be affected thereby and said 19 illegal, unenforceable or invalid part, term, or provision shall be deemed not to be part of this 20 Stipulation. 21 12. This Stipulation is limited to the agreement between the parties with respect to the 22 delinquent contributions and related sums enumerated herein, owed by Defendant to the Plaintiffs. 23 This Stipulation does not in any manner relate to withdrawal liability claims, if any. Defendant 24 acknowledges that the Plaintiffs expressly reserve their right to pursue withdrawal liability claims, 25 if any, against Defendant as provided by the Plaintiffs’ Plan Documents, Trust Agreements 26 incorporated into their Collective Bargaining Agreement, and the law. 27 13. All parties represent and warrant that they have had the opportunity to be or have 28 -5JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION Case No.: C10-3282 JL P:\CLIENTS\FLRCL\McCormick Floor Covering\McCormick Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation 091010.doc 1 been represented by counsel of their own choosing in connection with entering this Stipulation 2 under the terms and conditions set forth herein, and that they enter into this Stipulation voluntarily. 3 14. This Stipulation may be executed in any number of counterparts and by facsimile, 4 each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute together one and the 5 same instrument. 6 Dated: September , 2010 MCCORMICK FLOOR COVERING, INC. 7 By: 8 9 /s/ Michael Vincent McCormick RMO/CEO/President 10 11 Dated: September , 2010 12 MICHAEL VINCENT MCCORMICK /s/ Individually, as Guarantor 13 14 15 Dated: November 22, 2010 SALTZMAN AND JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 16 /s/ 17 Blake E. Williams Attorneys for Plaintiffs 19 22 UNIT ED December 2 21 Dated: _________________, 2010 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. ________________________________________ D UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE RDERE OO IT IS S R NIA 18 23 27 LI A H ER 26 FO Judge Ja RT 25 son mes Lar NO 24 N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 -6JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION Case No.: C10-3282 JL P:\CLIENTS\FLRCL\McCormick Floor Covering\McCormick Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation 091010.doc
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
