Jurgens v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., No. 3:2009cv02530 - Document 23 (N.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: STIPULATION AND ORDER extending time for defendants to file answer or responsive pleading to seven days after MDL transfer decision; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 9/18/2009. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2009)

Download PDF

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 STEVEN M. SELNA (SBN #133409) steven.selna@dbr.com JOHN J. POWERS (SBN #145623) john.powers@dbr.com BETH O. ARNESE (SBN #241186) beth.arnese@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2235 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 Attorneys for Defendant JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 MONIKA JURGENS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 v. Case No. C 09-02530 MHP STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., a New Jersey corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING SF01/ 654020.1 CASE NO. C 09-02530 MHP 1 PLAINTIFF MONIKA JURGENS AND DEFENDANT JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2 CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. ( Johnson & Johnson ), by and through their respective 3 attorneys of record hereby stipulate and agree to the following: 4 Johnson & Johnson is permitted an extension of time up to respond to Plaintiff s 5 Complaint until 7 (seven) calendar days after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 6 2091, In Re: Children s Personal Care Products Liability Litigation) issues a decision regarding 7 the transfer of this case to the District of New Jersey for consolidated pretrial proceedings. 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 9 10 Dated: September 17, 2009 DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 11 12 By:/s/Steven M. Selna Steven M. Selna 13 Attorneys for Defendant JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. 14 15 16 Dated: September 17, 2009 MILSTEIN, ADELMAN & KREGER, LLP 17 18 By:/s/ Jennifer B. Steinberg Jennifer B. Steinberg 19 20 Attorneys for Plaintiff MONIKA JURGENS 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING SF01/ 654020.1 -2- CASE NO. C 09-02530 MHP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 STEVEN M. SELNA (SBN #133409) steven.selna@dbr.com JOHN J. POWERS (SBN #145623) john.powers@dbr.com BETH O. ARNESE (SBN #241186) beth.arnese@dbr.com DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP 50 Fremont Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2235 Telephone: (415) 591-7500 Facsimile: (415) 591-7510 Attorneys for Defendant JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 MONIKA JURGENS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 14 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING v. 15 16 Case No. C 09-02530 MHP JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC., a New Jersey corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,, 18 Defendants. 19 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING SF01/ 654021.1 CASE NO. C 09-02530 MHP 1 Based upon the stipulation of the parties and for good cause shown, Defendant Johnson & 2 Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. is permitted an extension of time up to respond to Plaintiff s 3 Complaint until 7 (seven) calendar days after the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL 4 2091, In Re: Children s Personal Care Products Liability Litigation) issues a decision regarding 5 the transfer of this case to the District of New Jersey for consolidated pretrial proceedings. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. DERED O OR IT IS S The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel District Court Judge l H. Pate Marilyn Judge 10 NO 11 RT 12 ER 14 A H 13 R NIA 18 Dated: September _____, 2009 LI 9 FO UNIT ED 8 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 7 N D IS T IC T R OF C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D RINKER B IDDLE & R EATH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING SF01/ 654021.1 -2- CASE NO. C 09-02530 MHP

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.