In re Citibank HELOC Reduction Litigation, No. 3:2009cv00350 - Document 188 (N.D. Cal. 2013)
Court Description: FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 18, 2013. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2013)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
In re Citibank HELOC Reduction Litigation Doc. 188 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 IN RE CITIBANK HELOC REDUCTION LITIGATION No. 09-CV-0350-MMC CLASS ACTION 11 FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL 12 The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 13 14 15 16 17 18 Defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Defendant”), having settled with the Settlement Class and the Court having entered its Final Approval Order and directing entry of judgment, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. All claims of all members of the Settlement Class against Defendant, as defined in 19 this Court’s Final Approval Order, are dismissed with prejudice; 2. All claims of named plaintiffs, David Levin, Loren S. Siegel, Gary Cohen, Marie 20 Cohen, Mark Winkler, and Jennie LaPointe against Defendant are dismissed with prejudice; 21 3. Notwithstanding the dismissal of claims in the preceding paragraphs, the Court 22 shall retain jurisdiction over the construction, interpretation, implementation and enforcement of 23 the Settlement Agreement and to supervise and to adjudicate any disputes arising from the 24 25 disbursement of settlement benefits; and 4. All members of the Settlement Class, as defined in this Court’s Final Approval 26 Order, are bound by the Release of Claims set forth in the parties’ Settlement Agreement and are 27 28 Final Judgment of Dismissal Case No. 09-cv-0350 Dockets.Justia.com 1 hereby permanently enjoined and restrained from filing or prosecuting any Released Claim against 2 any Released Party as those terms are defined in the Parties’ Settlement Agreement. 3 THUS DONE AND SIGNED THIS 18th DAY OF MARCH 2013 AT SAN FRANCISCO, 4 CALIFORNIA. ___________________________________________ JUDGE MAXINE CHESNEY 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2Final Judgment of Dismissal Case No. 09-cv-0350
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
