United States of America v. Real Property and Improvements Located at 15000 Briceland Thorn Road, Whitehorn, California, Humbolt County, APN 215-172-045 et al, No. 3:2008cv03080 - Document 50 (N.D. Cal. 2010)
Court Description: ORDER GRANTING 49 Request to Continue Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/10/10. (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2010)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
United States of America v. Real Property and Improvements L...Humbolt County, APN 215-172-045 et al Case3:08-cv-03080-JSW Document49 1 Doc. 50 Filed02/09/10 Page1 of 6 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332) United States Attorney 2 3 4 BRIAN J. STRETCH (CSBN 163973) Chief, Criminal Division SUSAN B. GRAY (CSBN 100374) Assistant United States Attorney 5 6 7 450 Golden Gate Ave., Box 36055 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7324 Facsimile: (415) 436-7234 Email: susan.b.gray@usdoj.gov 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) 1. REAL PROPERTY AND ) IMPROVEMENTS LOCATED AT 15000 ) BRICELAND THORN ROAD, ) WHITETHORN, CALIFORNIA, et.al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Fowler Family Trust, Syd and Barbara ) Green, Robert Butler, and Donovan and ) Lynn Henry, ) ) Claimants. ) ____________________________________) No. C 08-3080 JSW JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE and [PROPOSED] ORDER CMC Date: February 19, 2010 Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom: 11, 19th Floor 23 Plaintiff, United States of America and claimants, Fowler Family Trust, Syd and Barbara 24 Green, Robert Butler, and Donavan and Lynn Henry, by and through their respective attorneys, 25 respectfully submit this Joint Case Management Statement and request to continue the Case 26 Management Conference. 27 1. Jurisdiction and Service 28 This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Sections 1345 and 1355 and -1Dockets.Justia.com Case3:08-cv-03080-JSW Document49 Filed02/09/10 Page2 of 6 1 Title 21, United States Code, Section 881(a)(7). There are no counterclaims. Plaintiff contends that 2 it has served notice of this action on all persons who may have a legal interest in the properties 3 remaining in this case, including the following: Syd and Barbara Green, Robert Butler, Donovan and 4 Lynn Henry, D.G and Sydell Fowler, and the Fowler Family Trust.1 5 The following individuals or entities have filed claims: the Fowler Family Trust and Syd and 6 Barbara Green, represented by Eugene Denson, Robert Butler, represented by Mark Eibert, and 7 Donovan and Lynn Henry, represented by David Michael and James Bustamonte. 8 2. Facts 9 This is an in rem forfeiture actions brought by the United States under Title 28, United States 10 Code, Sections 1345 and 1355(a), and Title 21, United States Code, Section 881(a)(7). The United 11 States alleges that defendant real properties represent property which facilitated a violation of Title 12 21, United States Code, Section 841(a)(1)-marijuana cultivation, and are thus subject to forfeiture 13 to the United States pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 881(a)(7). 14 15 Parties: Plaintiff is the United States of America. Defendants are real properties located in Humboldt County. 16 Claimants are owners or lien holders of the defendant properties. 17 Transaction or event: The complaint alleges that on June 24, 2008, federal law enforcement 18 agents, acting pursuant to federal warrants, executed searches at the defendant properties and, during 19 the course of their search of the defendant properties agents found extensive evidence of marijuana 20 cultivation operations. Specifically, the government alleges that the agents found the following: 21 22 Briceland/Donavan Henry Property: 8 pounds of processed marijuana located in the master bedroom, 72 marijuana plants in the attic, and 172 plants in greenhouses on the property; 23 Par Avenue/Fowler Family Trust Property: 15 pounds of processed marijuana in three garbage 24 bags in a bedroom, 148 marijuana plants, four indoor grow lights and bags of fertilizer in a second 25 26 27 28 1 The following individuals were also served and appeared: Alishia Stone, represented by Ismail J. Ramsey, Wendy Anne Fetzer and Gary Button, represented by Stephen Johnson, Mendocino Clearwater Corporation and John and Judith Brown, represented by Barry Meyer. With the dismissal of the complaint against 3602 Thomas Road, these claimants are no longer a party to this action. -2- Case3:08-cv-03080-JSW Document49 Filed02/09/10 Page3 of 6 1 bedroom, and an additional indoor grow room in the attic with 144 marijuana plants, four indoor 2 grow lights and water supplied from the house shower; 3 Eel River/Robert Butler Property: 400 marijuana plants in a green house on the property. The 4 twelve motorized grow lights hanging over the plants drew electricity from the house on the 5 property. 6 3. Principal Factual and Legal Issues 7 The principal factual and legal issues in dispute are: 1) whether plaintiff can establish by a 8 preponderance of the evidence that the defendant properties were used to facilitate marijuana 9 cultivation and are thus forfeitable under Title 21, United States Code, Section 881(a)(7), and 2) 10 whether claimants can establish by a preponderance of the evidence that they are innocent owners 11 of the defendant properties, or 3) the other affirmative defenses alleged in some of the Answers. 12 4. Anticipated Motions 13 All parties may move for summary judgment at the close of discovery. Some of the claimants 14 may allege that the forfeiture of their whole interest in the property will constitute an excessive fine 15 under the Eighth Amendment. Some claimants may also seek to challenge the search warrant and 16 subsequent search and seizure on Fourth Amendment grounds. 17 5. Relief/Damages 18 Plaintiff seeks a judgment of forfeiture of the defendant properties. This is not a damages case. 19 Claimants Syd and Barbara Green, seek an order from this Court declaring that their interest in 20 one the parcels named in this action, which is secured by a note and deed of trust, is not subject to 21 forfeiture and that their interest in the property is that of an innocent owner. 22 6. Settlement 23 At this juncture, matters are far too undeveloped to ascertain the possibility of settlement. 24 However, see, Section 12, infra. 25 7. Discovery 26 This is an in rem forfeiture case and is exempt from initial disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule 27 of Civil Procedure 26 (a)(1)(B)(ii). The parties suggest another case management conference would 28 be appropriate in four months for the reasons set forth in Section 11 and 12, infra. -3- Case3:08-cv-03080-JSW Document49 1 8. 4 5 6 7 Alternative Means of Disposition Plaintiff does not request reference to arbitration. 2 3 Filed02/09/10 Page4 of 6 9. Pretrial/Trial Issues The parties have not yet discussed any trial issues. 10. Class Action This is not a class action. 11. Related Case 8 The government alleges the following regarding the issue of related cases: 9 In 2004, Robert Juan formed the Lost Paradise Land Corporation and designated himself as 10 CEO. On March 30, 2004, Lost Paradise Land Corporation bought 945 acres of land in Humboldt 11 and Mendocino Counties from Diane and Eddie Mendes. According to the plan Juan set up, each 12 member of the Lost Paradise Land Corporation owned “shares” of the Land Corporation, including 13 Donavan Henry, one of the claimants in the case before this court. 14 In 2005 the Colburn Creek Land Corporation was formed, with Robert Juan’s involvement. 15 Each member of the Colburn Creek Land Corporation owned “shares” of the Land Corporation, 16 including Robert Butler, and Jonathan and Sydell Fowler2, claimants in the case before this court. 17 In 2005 Robert Juan also purchased approximately 960 acres of land in Mendocino County from 18 Barnum Timber Company. However, Robert Juan never transferred title of the 960 acres purchased 19 from Barnum Timber to Colburn Creek Land Corporation. 20 On June 24 and 25, 2008, law enforcement officers executed 30 search warrants at the homes 21 of the shareholders of Colburn Creek Land Corporation, Lost Paradise Land Corporation and on the 22 rural property described above, and recovered from various locations marijuana with an estimated 23 value of between 25 and 60 million dollars, weapons and cash. 24 On June 25, 2008, the United States filed a civil forfeiture complaint against the rural 25 properties described above. C 08-3093 WHA. Also, on June 25, 2008, the United States filed a civil 26 forfeiture complaint against four residential properties owned by shareholders of the Colburn Creek 27 28 2 The Fowler residence, one of the defendant properties in this case, is owned by the Fowler Family Trust, which is the actual claimant in the civil forfeiture action. Sydell Fowler is one of the trustees. -4- Case3:08-cv-03080-JSW Document49 Filed02/09/10 Page5 of 6 1 Land Corporation and the Lost Paradise Land Corporation. C 08-3080 JSW. Shortly thereafter, the 2 United States filed an Administrative Motion to Relate the two cases. The motion was denied by 3 this Court on September 23, 2008. Since that time Judge Alsup has stayed the case before him, 4 pending the criminal investigation. The next case management conference before Judge Alsup is 5 set for February 25, 2010. The parties to that action continue to request a stay, given the pending 6 criminal indictments against two of the claimants, Paul Sayers and Graeson Prescott. 7 On November 24, 2009, the grand jury returned numerous indictments against several 8 shareholders of the Lost Paradise Land Corporation and other associates of Robert Juan. Donavan 9 Henry, the claimant to Briceland Thorn Road, was among those indicted. Each of the criminal 10 indictments involve similar violations of law, and they all arose out of the same investigation and 11 involve the same underlying affidavit in support of the search warrants executed on June 24 and 25, 12 2008, and described above. On January 22, 2010, the United States filed a Notice of Related Case 13 notifying this Court of the related nature of the civil forfeiture and pending criminal cases. On 14 February 4, 2010, this Court notified the Assistant United States Attorney handling the criminal 15 cases that the cases would not be related. 16 12. Other Matters 17 Given the recent indictment, the United States and claimant Butler have discussed requesting 18 a stay of the civil forfeiture proceedings. However, rather than make such a formal motion, the 19 parties suggest that the court continue the case management conference for an additional 120 days. 20 As noted in prior case management statements, the parties have engaged in settlement discussions 21 and have had the properties reappraised to aid those discussions. Those discussions continue. The 22 parties suggest that the current case management conference should be continued for approximately 23 120 days to allow for settlement discussions to continue and/or stay motions to be filed. In the 24 alternative, if the Court is not inclined to continue the case management conference, several of the 25 parties intend to move for a stay so that they will not be forced to choose between complying with 26 discovery in this case and with exercising their privilege against self-incrimination in a criminal 27 investigation. 28 Finally, the Assistant United States Attorney assigned this case will be out of the state the week -5- Case3:08-cv-03080-JSW Document49 Filed02/09/10 Page6 of 6 1 of February 15-19 and respectfully requests that if the court does not decide to continue the currently 2 scheduled case management conference for 120 days, that it be continued for several weeks. The 3 parties have conferred regarding their respective schedules and suggest April 2, 2010, as an 4 alternative date. Mr. Denson is unavailable on any prior dates. 5 6 DATED: February 9, 2010 _________/s/_______________________ SUSAN B. GRAY Assistant United States Attorney 7 8 9 DATED: February 9, 2010 ________/s/____________________________ EUGENE DENSON Attorney for Claimants Fowler Family Trust, and Syd and Barbara Green 10 11 12 DATED: February 9, 2010 ________/s/_____________________ DAVID MICHAEL JAMES BUSTAMONTE Attorney for Claimants Donavan and Lynn Henry DATED: February 9, 2010 ________/s/____________________ MARK EIBERT Attorney for Claimant Robert Butler 13 14 15 16 17 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER 19 20 21 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1:30 p.m. August 13 2010, at ________. SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 19, 2010, IS CONTINUED TO _________, 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 Dated: February 10, 2010 __________________________ JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 27 28 -6-
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
