Jarrett et al v. InterMune Inc et al, No. 3:2008cv02376 - Document 87 (N.D. Cal. 2009)

Court Description: ORDER granting leave to file statement of recent decision; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 1/26/2009. (awb, COURT-STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 DEBORAH JANE JARRETT, NANCY ISENHOWER, AND JEFFREY H. FRANKEL, Plaintiffs, v. INTERMUNE, INC., W. SCOTT HARKONEN, AND GENENTECH, INC., Defendants. LINDA K. RYBKOSKI, Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No.: No. 3:08-cv-02376 MHP [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION Civil Case No.: No. 3:08-cv-02916 MHP 16 17 INTERMUNE, INC., W. SCOTT HARKONEN, AND GENENTECH, INC., Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Civil Case No.: No. 3:08-cv-03797 MHP GENENTECH, INC., INTERMUNE, INC., AND W. SCOTT HARKONEN, Defendants. GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES HEALTH ASSOCIATION, INC., Plaintiff, v. INTERMUNE, INC., W. SCOTT HARKONEN, AND GENENTECH, INC., Defendants. 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION CASE NOS. 3:08-cv-02376, -02916, -03797, and -04531 MHP Civil Case No.: No. 3:08-cv-04531 MHP 1 2 3 BEFORE THE COURT is Defendants Motion for Leave to File Statement of Recent Decision. The Court, being otherwise duly advised, it is hereby ORDERED: 4 1. Defendants Motion for Leave to File Statement of Recent Decision is GRANTED; 5 6 2. The Statement of Recent Decision attached hereto as Exhibit A, respecting Ironworkers 7 Local Union No. 68 v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, 585 F. Supp. 2d 1339 (M.D. 8 Fla. Nov. 4, 2008), is deemed filed. S 12 ari Judge M 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION CASE NOS. 3:08-cv-02376, -02916, -03797, and -04531 MHP 2 A H ER LI RT 14 atel lyn H. P NO 13 R NIA 11 _______________________________________ ERED THE HONORABLE MARILYN H. PATEL O ORD T IS S UNITEDISTATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE FO 1/26/2009 DATED: ___________ UNIT ED 10 RT U O 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.